Cassava processors reap the benefits of new techniques

Research Into Use

Improved cassava processing for resource poor households for income generation and to ensure safety
Validated RNRRS Output. Home List by Audience List by Topic

New processing technologies are enabling resource-poor cassava growers in sub-Saharan Africa to produce popular products for the market. They are selling high quality cassava flour and chips at a range of outlets in Tanzania, Madagascar, Zambia, Uganda and Mozambique. Processing equipment, produced locally at low cost, is reducing drudgery and credit schemes are allowing the cassava processors to get their businesses off the ground. Manuals and participatory methods are helping to spread the use of the new technology, monitor adoption and link cassava processors to markets.

Project Ref: CPH30:
Topic: 5. Rural Development Boosters: Improved Marketing, Processing & Storage
Lead Organisation: Natural Resources Institute (NRI), UK
Source: Crop Post Harvest Programme


Contents:

Description
  Validation
  Current Situation
  Environmental Impact

Description

Research Programmes:

The main RNRRS Programme was the Crop Post Harvest Programme

Other activities have been supported by the Common Fund for Commodities and DFID on Regional Africa Project on Non Grain Starch Staples (NGSS), 1993 -1998.

Relevant Research Projects:

  • R6332: Improved cassava processing technology for vulnerable households in Tanzania
  • R6639: Improved cassava utilisation practices in Tanzania

and also:

  • R5079: Development and field testing of needs assessment methodologies in traditional root crop post-harvest systems: 
  • R6506: Development and orientation of cassava chip production in relation to national and international markets for food consumption and animal feed in Ghana
  • R7580: Improved cassava chip processing to access urban markets
  • R7497: Commercialisation of Cassava Processing to Enhance Rural Livelihoods
  • R7495: Commercialisation of traditional processed cassava products to maximise benefits and sustain rural livelihoods
  • Professor Andrew Westby, Director of Research and Enterprise, Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, United Kingdom, Tel: 01634 883478: Fax 01634 880066, A.Westby@gre.ac.uk.
  • Dr Nicholas Mlingi, Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC), 22 Ocean Road, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, nmlingi@yahoo.co.uk
  • Dr Geoffrey Mkamilo, Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box, 509 Mtwara, Tanzania
  • Ms Elizabeth Ndedya, Rural Integrated Project Support (RIPS), P.O. Box 113, Mtwara, Tanzania.
  • Dr Regina Kapinga/  Theresa Ngendello, Lake Zone Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 1433, Mwanza, Tanzania.
  • (Dr Regina Kapinga now works for the International Potato Centre (CIP), Uganda).
  • IITA Tanzania, c/o Mikocheni Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 6226, Dar es Salaam
  • Dr Paa Nii Johnson, Food Research Institute, Accra, Ghana



Research Outputs, Problems and Solutions:

This portfolio of outputs started with strategic research in the late 1980s and was continued through to more adaptive research up to 2004.

Cassava is an important food security and income generation crop for resource poor households in many countries of sub-Saharan Africa.  The cyanogen content of cassava roots is a drawback, but research has shown that this can be over-come by the use of appropriate low cost processing methods.  An important concern for resource poor households is the need to generate income from marketing of cassava and its products.  This portfolio of projects has developed and tested low-cost processing technologies to produce high quality products to be marketed.  Although knowledge of safe processing methods is important, it is the linkage to market that is a more significant factor in adoption. 

Specific outputs from this portfolio of projects include:

-          Identification of processing techniques that produce safe cassava products

-          A distance learning guide for safe cassava processing

-          Low cost systems for the value-added processing of high quality cassava flour (HQCF) and chips for a range of market outlets including supermarkets and animal feed.

-          Specific pieces of locally fabricated processing equipment that can be purchased/fabricated at low cost to reduce drudgery in cassava processing.

-          A market chain-based approach to cassava sector development

-          (from related projects) motorised processing equipment.

-          Approaches to involvement of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs)  in linking cassava processors to markets

-          How to take a coalition-based livelihoods approach to develop markets for dried cassava flour and chips.

-          Approaches to provision of credit for cassava processing.

Cassava is widely grown in many of the DFID PSA Countries in Africa and Asia.  These technologies can be promoted through a partnership approach in selected countries.   The partners should be selected from throughout the cassava processing value chain from farmer to consumer


Types of Research Output:

Product Technology Service Processor Methodology Policy Other
X X X X    


Major Commodities Involved:

The main commodity the outputs focused on is cassava and its products.  The principals of the approach that supports commercialisation could apply to any tropical roots crop and other food products that have commercial potential through improved processing for value addition.


Production Systems:
Explanation of Production Systems

Semi-Arid High potential Hillsides Forest-Agriculture Peri-urban Land water Tropical moist forest Cross-cutting
      X X     X


Farming Systems:

Smallholder rainfed humid Irrigated Wetland rice based Smallholder rainfed highland Smallholder rainfed dry/cold Dualistic Coastal artisanal fishing
X            


Potential for Added Value:

There are effectively a cluster of three sets of cassava post-harvest outputs that all could add value to cassava production.  These are:

  1. The ones from this cluster for resource poor households for improving food security and to diversify cassava utilisation.
  2. The ones from cluster entitled "Commercialisation of traditional processed cassava products to maximise benefits and sustain rural livelihoods" (R7495 and related projects) that deal with meeting urban food needs and
  3. The ones from ""Cassava as an industrial commodity High Quality Cassava Flour" [R6504/ R7418/R8268] that deals with meeting commercial demand and for market access.

Elements of other RNRRS outputs that could potentially add value include the following:

         Participatory Market Chain Analysis (PMCA) - R8182 R8418 - the livelihoods of those working in the market chain that supplies the cassava traditional processing chain require support but rural processors may be highly vulnerable;

         Knowledge management - R8402 -information and ideas need to be effectively shared and discussed;

         Farmer access to markets - R8275, R8274, R8498 - the size and value of the cassava sector can be significant.  Support for this sector will provide secure and sustainable incomes for farmers, rural processors and market traders;

         Market information tools - R7151, R8250, R7494, R8422 - Improved information and access to it will help support and sustain livelihoods;

         Decision tools for institutional change in public and private sectors - R7502, R6306 - these projects have involved key institutions (public and private) in the traditional processing sector.  These tools may support this process;

         Promotion of control for cassava brown streak disease - R8227, R8404 -farmers need to be able to meet the demand for cassava by processors;

         PPT breeding disease resistant cassava - R8405, R8302, R7565 - farmers need to be able to meet the demand for cassava by processors;

         Extending the control of cassava mosaic disease - R8456, R8303 - farmers need to be able to meet the demand for cassava by processors;

         Improved storage for wet cassava starch & Small to medium scale cassava starch - R6316 - components of these technologies can be transferred to rural processors.


Validation

How the outputs were validated:

There are several different types of outputs from this cluster of projects - most focus on rather basic processing of cassava by resource poor households.  Each has been validated in different ways. A problem in describing the portfolio of outputs is that the cluster has emerged from initially being focussed on ensuring safe processing of cassava to the production of cassava products for the market.  The outputs were:

A.      Three improved methods for processing cassava to ensure food safety and food security and their dissemination

B.     Products from improved processing with less than 90% of initial cyanogen content

C.     A community-based participatory methodology for monitoring adoption of the new technology  in the villages

D.     A package of methods for assessing the quality characteristics of root and tuber crops in the field and the laboratory.

E.     Processing systems developed for resource poor farmers that enabled efficient processing to market outlets

Output A (effective means of cassava processing to ensure food safety and security) was validated in on-station trials at Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute and on-farm trials in the four selected villages namely Makukwe, Nakahako, Mumbaka and Mkarango in Mtwara region, Southern Tanzania. Participatory monitoring was installed in the villages to monitor the uptake and spread of the technology.   In addition a distance learning package (Bainbridge et al. 1997) on improved cassava processing was developed and validated through testing with resource poor households in Southern Tanzania.

Output B (products from improved processing with less than 90% of cyanogens produced by the methods) was validated by testing the acceptability of the processed products in the selected villages in Southern Tanzania . The equipment that was used in producing the HQCF was also validated in each village in 1997/98.

Output C (A community-based participatory methodology for monitoring adoption of the new technology  in the villages) was validated at a workshop involving Village Extension Officers (VEOs) and District Extension Officers (DEOs) and project participants was convened to develop indicators for monitoring technology uptake of the technology in the selected villages by VEOs. 

Output D (A package on methods for assessing the quality characteristics of root and tuber crops  in the field and the laboratory was developed and disseminated) a training workshop involving laboratory technicians from four laboratories was carried out to test the package on methods for assessing the quality characteristics of root and tuber crops in the field and the laboratory.

Output E. The methods have been replicated and hence validated in other  regions of Tanzania, such as Coast and Dar es Salaam region and Zanzibar by TFNC, Ministry of Agriculture Food and Cooperatives (MAFC), Agricultural Research Institutes, Small  Industrial Development Organisation (SIDO), women groups and some NGOs In addition, the CFC funded project on "Small scale cassava processing and vertical integration of the cassava sub-sector in Eastern and Southern Africa" is being implemented in five countries where farmer groups in some villages, NGOs and MAFC are using it for processing of HQCF and for training other groups.

Where the Outputs were Validated:

The outputs were validated at Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute, Mtwara in 1997/98 and in the four selected villages before evaluation and completion of the project. The validation of technology was undertaken by NRI, TFNC, Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Integrated Programme Support. Two NGOs namely TADENA and Plan International together with Kibaha Sugar Research Institute (SRI) were involved in technology dissemination.

End users include farmers, processors, traders, bakery industries and household consumers. The export sector is a potential end-user of HQCF in the near future.

The package on methods for assessing the quality characteristics of root and tuber crops in the field and the laboratory was validated in 1997 during a training course in TFNC, Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) and Sokoine University of Agriculture laboratories.


Current Situation

Who are the Users?

The slight difficulty in answering this question is the fact that the initial outputs were developed 10 years ago and this has led to a series of other outputs and initiatives.  We have focussed on Tanzania, but there are other activities in other countries that may not have been so well covered.

Currently a limited number of farmer groups and processors in Mtwara region southern Tanzania, Coast, Zanzibar and Dar es Salaam regions are using the outputs for processing HQCF which is on great demand in the supermarkets, retail shops and restaurants for household consumers and in the textile industry where it can be transformed into starch in Dar es Salaam. This is not currently a concerted effort but a series of initiatives.

As a result of validation of the processing equipment in southern Tanzania, a private company called Intermech Engineering in Morogoro is fabricating cassava processing equipment for various clients.

The distance learning package was translated into Portuguese using USAID funds and used in nutritional education programmes in Mozambique.

The analytical manuals, produced through the Regional Africa Project, are being used for assessing quality characteristics in cassava by various laboratories such as Tanzania Bureau of Standards, Sokoine University of Agriculture and Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority (TFDA) in Tanzania.  Use is also widespread through sub-Saharan Africa.

Where the outputs have been used:

The processing technologies or variations of them are being used in the former project areas in southern Tanzania especially in Mtwara, Coast, Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, Kigoma regions and Zanzibar and in Madagascar, Zambia, , Uganda and Mozambique where the project on Small scale cassava processing is being implemented.

The analytical manuals are being used in different countries which participated in the regional training workshop such as Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Zambia and Mozambique.   They are also being used in West African countries as a consequence of training workshops there.

Scale of Current Use:

The current scale of use of the technology differs from region to region. For example in Mtwara region, there are about eight farmers groups/processors while in the Coast region there are eighteen and in Zanzibar there is one farmers group processing HQCF. At the same time there is only one equipment fabricator in the whole country currently supplying cassava processing equipment. Plan International supplied more than 25 cassava processing equipment to various villages in one district namely Kisarawe.

In the use of quality assessment manual the laboratories which were involved are still using the different methods of assessing the root and tuber characteristics.

It took at least two years for the technologies to spread from Southern Tanzania to Coast and Dar es Salaam regions until when they were initially taken up by Southern Africa Root crop Research Network (SARRNET) and later by CFC project on small scale cassava processing started in the year 2003. Usage of the technologies is still spreading in some regions such as Kigoma in western Tanzania and Mwanza in Lake Victoria zone.

Fabrication of equipment has remained the mandate of one company the Intermech Engineering Co. Ltd of Morogoro, although two other companies in Lake Zone of Tanzania have also fabricated chipping cassava machines.

Policy and Institutional Structures, and Key Components for Success:

Currently promotion/ uptake of outputs is taking place in Tanzania and in four other countries implementing the project on small scale cassava processing where efforts to process HQCF for industrial use and marketing are going on. In Tanzania, four pilot sites for processing HQCF have been established in four different regions to meet the demand of the commodity in the urban areas. After supporting them with equipment and training farmers/ processors are producing HQCF flour to supply to the markets which were identified by the project.

Various workshops (national and regional) that were convened specifically to discuss implementation and project progress assisted in the promotion and/or adoption of the outputs. Reports and publications from data generated by this work has been presented in various forums such as the International Society for Tropical Root Crops (ISTRC) meetings, cassava safety workshop, FOODNET and SARRNET Scientific meetings and internal seminars in respective institutions. Some of the data has been published in peer reviewed journals such as the Food Chemistry and Journal of Horticulture.

Participation in various exhibitions such as the World Food day, the UN Week, and Farmers day has also promoted products produced by these technologies.


Environmental Impact

Direct and Indirect Environmental Benefits:

Direct environmental benefits related to the outputs include the following:

1)      Men may be attracted in cassava processing because it has been realized to be an income generating activity and will get involved in cassava production, processing and marketing. In this way they will refrain from the activity of generating funds from other activities, such as charcoal making, and will concentrate on cassava processing and marketing.

2)      Cassava peels are usually consumed by animals such as cows, goats and pigs. The peels and leaves will be useful in feeding animals instead of depending only on grass/fodder. Note that cassava leaves are a good source of iron and β (beta) carotene and are always eaten by several people as a food relish. This could serve as a food source to the farmers/processors.

3)  The cassava peels can be used to make compost manure which in turn could be used by farmers to restore fertility of the soils in their fields.

4)   In marketing of added value cassava products the government will tax the traders and this is the best way for local governments to collect revenue which will in turn be used for improvement of infra structure or other social services.

Adverse Environmental Impacts:

The cassava processing methods promoted are generally environmentally friendly relying mainly on sun-drying to dry the products. However, two adverse environmental impacts could be that:

  1. Cassava processing leads to  accumulation of wastes mainly the peels.  Measures should be taken to ensure appropriate disposal of waste products.
  1. As cassava production systems become more profitable farmers might expand the area under cultivation.  Clearly this needs to be done in a sustainable manner.

Coping with the Effects of Climate Change, or Risk from Natural Disasters:

The outputs of these projects contribute to ensure the safety of cassava producers especially during times of food insecurity. Climate change in the short to medium term is likely to lead to more climate variability, leading for example to more frequent drought. The technologies generated in this project were developed to cope with periods of drought (i.e. rapid processing of cassava when cassava is the only food crops available)  and so the outputs have great capacity to increase resilience effects of climatic change and variability.

More generally cassava is a drought resistant crop which has the capacity to withstand climate variability, e.g. drought tolerance. Promotion of cassava products will increase the capacity of poor people because there is market for the products and is beneficial to enable poor people cope with climate variability.


Relevant Research Projects, with links to the
Research for Development (R4D) web site
and Technical Reports:

R4D Project Title Technical Report
R5079 Development and field testing of needs assessment methodologies in traditional root crop post-harvest systems (Non grain starch staples post-harvest and technology transfer project)  
  • Low-cost storage of fresh sweet potatoes in Uganda: lessons from participatory and on-station approaches to technology choice and adaptive testing

(13 MB)
  • Sweetpotato postharvest systems in Uganda: strategies, constraints and potentials

(6.82 MB)
R6306 Field trials for quality assurance for horticultural exports.
R6316 Small scale starch extraction and storage to improve process efficiency
R6332 Improved cassava processing technology for vulnerable households in Tanzania.
R6504 Expanded markets for locally produced cassava flours and starches in Ghana
R6506 Development and orientation of cassava chip production in relation to national and international markets for food consumption and animal feed in Ghana.  
  • Cassava chip processing in Ghana: participatory post-harvest research and technology transfer in response to new market opportunities. pp. 59-65. In: Enhancing post-harvest technology generation and dissemination in Africa. Kwarteng, J. (Ed.) Mexico City: Sasakawa Africa Association.
R6639 Improved cassava utilisation in Tanzania  
R7151 Overcoming information constraints: improving horticultural marketing and technical information flows to smallholders
R7418 Development of new market opportunities, to increase the contribution that cassava makes to sustainable rural livelihoods 28 MB
R7494 Optimisation of horticulture research and uptake in India through the development of technical and management systems with public and private sector partners
R7495 Identification of an approach to the commercialisation of cassava fufu processing in West Africa that maximises benefits to sustainable rural livelihoods
R7497 Commercialisation of cassava processing to enhance rural livelihoods in Eastern and Southern Africa  
  • Cassava utilisation, storage and processing. Chapter 14 in Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization; Hillocks, R.J.; Bellotti, A.C. (Eds.); CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK
  • Case study on the technical and economic aspects of small-scale cassava processing in a selected village in the Lake Zone of Tanzania
R7502 Optimising institutional arrangements for demand-driven post-harvest research, delivery, uptake and impact on the livelihoods of the poor, through public and private sector partnerships
R7565 Participatory breeding of superior, mosaic disease-resistant cassava
R7580 Improved cassava chip processing to access urban markets
R8182 Strengthening technical innovation systems in potato-based agriculture in Bolivia: Bolivia Initiative
R8227 Promotion of control measures for cassava brown streak disease.
Main Report. Annex 1, Annex 2, Annex 3, Annex 4, Annex 5.
R8250 Decentralised market information service in Lira District, Uganda
R8268 Sustainable uptake of cassava as an industrial commodity
R8274 Improvement of maize marketing through adoption of improved post-harvest technologies and farmer group storage: a case study of Kiboga and Apac districts
R8275 Farmer Organisations for market access
R8302 Participatory breeding of superior, mosaic disease-resistant cassava: validation, promotion and dissemination
R8303 Maximising, disseminating and promoting the benefits to farmers of cassava varieties resistant to cassava mosaic disease
R8402 STEP tools to package and deliver information for local use
R8404 Promotion of control measures for cassava brown streak disease.
Main Report. Annex1, Annex 2.
R8405 Participatory breeding of superior, mosaic disease-resistant cassava: enhancing uptake
R8418 Promotion and development of the participatory market chain approach (PMCA) in Uganda
R8422 Improving farmer and other stakeholders' access to quality information and products for pre- and post- harvest maize systems management in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania.
R8456 Extending the control of cassava mosaic disease and cassava whiteflies in East Africa
R8498 Analysis of promotion and uptake pathways for CPH research

 

For relevant research projects, with links to further information Go to the list



Geographical regions included:

Kenya, Madagascar, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia,


View all Audiences or BeneficiariesTarget Audiences for this content:

Crop farmers,