A programme designed to
help farmers make the most of surplus production has identified 20 local and
300 potential global markets for fresh sweet potato grown in Kenya, Rwanda,
Tanzania and Uganda. More than 2000 farmers were able to access new markets
and cut their on-farm post-harvest losses by 20-30%. Previously, these
farmers were unable to appreciate the benefits of new, high-yielding
varieties that produce three times as much as the former ones. The programme
promoted a range of orange-fleshed sweet potato-based products. At the industrial
scale, at least three private firms now absorb over 80 MT of dried sweet
potato chips per month.
Project Ref: CPH44:
Topic: 5. Rural Development Boosters: Improved Marketing, Processing &
Storage
Lead Organisation: PRAPACE, Uganda
Source: Crop Post Harvest Programme
Description
Research Programmes:
- Crop Post
Harvest (CPHP) programme was the major source of funds.
- The Regional
Network for the Improvement of Potato and Sweetpotato in Eastern and
Central Africa (PRAPACE) contributed funds.
- Horticultural
Strategic Intervention Programme, Uganda contributed funds
- NARO
contributed in-kind contribution.
Relevant Research Projects:
R8273: Improving the livelihoods of small-scale sweet potato farmers in
Central Uganda through a crop post harvest-based innovation system
The above-named project was implemented by a range
of partners in the science community, government, private sector and civil
society. The partners formed a coalition that productively worked together
under the management of the regional network-PRAPACE.
The coalition of comprised the following partners
| Managing Partner |
The Regional Network for the
Improvement of Potatoes and Sweetpotato in Eastern and Central Africa
(PRAPACE). Contact: Dr. Berga Lemaga. P.O. Box 22274
Kampala- Uganda. Office tel.
+256-41-286209, mob :+256-772-696808. Fax.
+256-41-286947. E-mail: berga@prapace.co.ug
|
| Core Partners |
- Buganda Cultural and Development Foundation
(BUCADEF). Contact: Mr. Kyewalabye Male. P.O Box, 34071,Kampala- Uganda. Tel: 256 41 271870. Fax + 256(0) 41344169. bucadef@infocom.co.ug
- BUCADEF and associated Farmer
groups in Luweero, Contact: Mr. Ssetyabula
Rajab. P.O.Box 34071, Kampala- Uganda. Personal Tel: 256 (0)
77 549332, Office Tel.
+256(0)41271870, Fax +256(0)41344169, bucadef@infocom.co.ug
- Namulonge Agricultural and
Animal production Research Institute (NAARI): Contact: Dr. Robert Mwanga, P.O Box, 7084,
Kampala- Uganda, Tel. +256 77 2825725.naari@afsat.com
- Kawanda Agricultural Research
Institute (KARI). Contact: Constance Owori. P.O Box, 7084, Kawanda-
Uganda. Tel. +256 77 2663690. oworiconstance@hotmail.com
- International Potato Center
(CIP). Contact: Dr. Regina Kapinga. P.O. Box 22274
Kampala- Uganda. Office tel.
+256-41-287571, mob :+256-772-563217. Fax.
+256-41-287538. R. Kapinga@CGIAR.ORG
- FOODNET (A regional
agricultural research network focusing on market-oriented research). Contact: Mr. Jjagwe John. P.O Box 7878 Kampala-
Uganda. Tel: 256 41 223460, Fax 256 41 223459, foodnet@imul.com
- Horticultural Exporters Association of Uganda (HORTEXA). Contact: Mr D. Lule. P.O Box 29392, Kampala-Uganda. Tel: +256 77 419357,
Fax: +256 78 2214202. hortexa@yahoo.com
- Food Science and Technology
Research Institute: Contact: Dr William Sali. P.O Box 7852
Kawanda-Uganda. Tel.: +256 41 566844.
- Maganjo Millers. Contact: Ms Mary Tamale. Tel: +256 41
567935/566394, Fax:+ 256 41
566394/567097
- The Royal Institute of
Business and Technology. Contact: Ms Leticia Nakimuli. P.O Box 29599,
Kampala-Uganda. Tel +256 77
2760853.
- Department of Food Science
& Technology. Contact: Dr. Agnes Namutebi. Makerere University,
Department of Food Science & Technology. P.O. Box 7062,
Kampala- Uganda. Tel: +256-71 2958736. asnamutebi@agric.mak.ac.ug
- Tonet Enterprises. Contact: Mr. Joseph Kavuma. Kalerwe Gayaza Road. P.O. Box 3163, Kampala, Uganda. Tel: +256-77 2413754. kalerwe@yahoo.com
|
Research Outputs, Problems and Solutions:
Project R8273 was a follow-up of project R8040
that was successful in alleviating food insecurity but paved way for another
set of constraints namely; surpluses in production as improved varieties
often produced about three times more than the traditional ones, and
post-harvest losses topping >25%. Farmers, therefore, according to
Uganda's Plan for Modernisation of Agriculture (PMA) experienced only modest
rates of poverty reduction, as they failed to capture the potential gains due
to limited market access.
The project was implemented between 1st January 2003 and 31st December 2004. The purpose was to promote
the adoption of CPHP, PRAPACE and CIP outputs in a manner that (i) improves
rural producers' access to markets (ii) improves employment opportunities for
the resource poor and (iii) culminates into an institutional framework for
stakeholders to sustain links to markets, sources of knowledge and
technologies.
Twenty local and 300
potential global markets were identified for fresh sweetpotato and >2000
farmers linked to the new markets that required over 80 MT of fresh roots per
month, mostly for export. Export markets have since 2003 absorbed at least
1,000 MT of three varieties that also are grown in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania
and Uganda.
Five methods and systems of processing sweetpotato
into flour and weaning food for the resource poor and several sweetpotato
flour-based recipes were adaptively tested and disseminated in both rural
and urban areas, particularly in areas where the private sector is capable of
absorbing large quantities of sweetpotato.
At rural level, Community-based
Organizations are producing and marketing a range of orange-fleshed
sweetpotato-based products.
At the industrial scale, at least three medium to
large-scale private firms are already demanding over 80 MT of dried
sweetpotato chips per month (mainly orange-fleshed) and a number of the
recipes as a basis for their commercial products. This translates to monthly
supply of over 240 MT of fresh sweetpotato. The companies are UGACHICK
FEEDS LTD that process animal and poultry feeds, MAGANJO MILLERS LTD
and KASAWO MILLERS that process packaged foods and confectionery for
humans. However, the demand of UGACHICK has not yet been met.
Over 2,000 farmers were
also sensitized and trained on four on-farm post-harvest loss mitigation
technologies that reduced losses from 30 to 20%.
The coalition finally
evolved into a national umbrella/apex institution called (Uganda
Sweetpotato Development Association) that mobilizes stakeholders in the
sector for collective action and prepares members for facing livelihood
challenges.
Types of Research Output:
| Product |
Technology |
Service |
Process
or Methodology |
Policy |
Other |
| X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Major Commodities Involved:
Sweetpotato is the focal crop. However, the
generated outputs could well be relevant to other major Eastern and Central
African staples notably potato, bananas and cassava that are also
vegetatively propagated.
Production Systems: 
| Semi-Arid |
High
potential |
Hillsides |
Forest-Agriculture |
Peri-urban |
Land
water |
Tropical
moist forest |
Cross-cutting |
| X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
Farming Systems: 
| Smallholder
rainfed humid |
Irrigated |
Wetland
rice based |
Smallholder
rainfed highland |
Smallholder
rainfed dry/cold |
Dualistic |
Coastal
artisanal fishing |
| X |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
Potential for Added Value:
Though past validation phases successfully
identified a significant number of markets and efforts were also made to link
producers to markets, the producers have not effectively responded to the
market. This was mainly because of the illusion that farmers had that
processed products result in very high profits. However, production of fresh
roots and vines was very profitable. The failure of processed products to
result in good economic returns could be attributed to a range of
institutional, marketing and policy constraints.
To overcome these constraints, the Uganda
Sweetpotato Development Association (USPDA) that evolved out CPHP experiences
could do the following.
In the short-run motivate discouraged producers by
strengthening available market linkages in a way that harnesses broadened
partnerships that are geared to generating benefits for putting back into the
partnership. This could involve: (1) enhancing smallholder farmer's capacity
for collaborative bargaining (R7502, 6306, 8182, 8271, 8431, 8418, 8275,
8498, 8421 and 8274), (2) encouraging private entrepreneur investment in
value addition, including for feed (R7520, 8113, 8114, 6769, 6507 and 7498),
(3) encouraging formulation of favourable policies and harmonization of
standards (R7493, 8270, 8433, 8366 and 8272), (4) Increasing awareness and information dissemination
(ZB0380 and R8402), (5) improving market efficiency (R8422, 7151,
8250 and 7494) and (6) improving productivity through quality vine
production with private sector (R8303, 8278 and 8302).
In the long-run, develop innovative ways of
creating a lasting local market that is capable of absorbing large quantities
of sweetpotato and other agricultural produce via orienting research towards
the use sweetpotato for food, feed and energy. Increasing attention should be
given to transforming starchy and oily crops into Bio-fuels to meet the
region's increasing energy requirements.
( R6087, 6504, 7418, 8268, some of the RNRRS-forestry outputs together with
others generated in particularly in Tanzania, Malawi and India).
Validation
How the outputs were validated:
The project identified marketing systems, adding
value, and reducing storage losses as the priority areas for increasing
market access for rural sweetpotato producers in Uganda. The approach used
was one that promotes the use of CPHP and PRAPACE outputs while at the same
time developing an innovation system to sustain the access to markets and
help farmers to have access to sources of new knowledge and technologies.
These areas were addressed as follows:
Marketing systems: by developing ways of linking rural producers
directly with stable local, regional and global markets through: (i) A
network of Boarding Schools, medium-scale food-processors and exporters to
which produce/products from the rural producer/ agro processor groups would
be marketed (ii) enhancing stakeholders' capacity to set up viable rural
agri-business firms (iii) establishing and promoting contract farming arrangements
between small holders and agri-business firms (iv) collaborating with FOODNET
a regional market information provider in setting up a supply/markets
information database that is readily accessible and user friendly to all
stakeholders in the sector. Moreover, with regard to linking rural SP
producers to markets for fresh roots, the project drew lessons from the
outputs of R7478.
Value addition: was promoted mainly through the formation
(through the NGO BUCADEF) of groups of rural based processors targeting
mainly rural youth, female-headed and child-headed households so as to target
gender, poverty and HIV/AIDS. Much attention was also given to enhancing the
post-harvest capacity of such producer groups and that of food processors
through empowering and training themin SP value addition and
enterprise development using outputs from (R7497, R7036) and some of
PRAPACE's outputs particularly technologies for production of quality SP
chips and flour, bringing into the partnership machine fabricators village
artisans. The objective was to develop products (initially pro-Vitamin-A
enriched) for rural consumption, schools and large scale processors.
The development of an innovation system: was through:
a. Formation of standing
partnership organs (particularly committees) with negotiated process for
interaction between the rural producer and processor groups and the other
members of the partnership. This entailed activities such as formation of a
work team interest group with a common vision, strategy and objectives. The
project particularly aimed at empowering the rural groups to participate in
the partnership through training in group formation and partnership dynamics
as well as facilitating them to access credit and to tap into development resources
available from publicly-funded programmes.
b. Fostering the formation of "Nutrition
and Crop-post harvest student clubs" The groups were initially to be
formed within the network of schools that had been linked to the SP producer
and processor groups. The clubs would then be involved in the promotion of
the consumption of SP and SP products and in the process get exposed storage
and value addition technologies.
c. A network of researchers
(local, regional, international) who were to (i) adapt and validate CPHP and
PRAPACE knowledge and outputs (ii) train farmer advisors and the user groups
(iii) undertake additional research (iv) derive lessons for up-scaling from
emerging partnerships.
d. A local NGO to mobilise,
sensitise, train facilitate groups in the partnership
Where the Outputs were Validated:
o The project outputs were validated
during January 2003 and December 2004 in three districts of central Uganda namely;
Luwero, Wakiso and Mpigi Districts that lie 1,000 - 1,300 m.a.s.l, under
rain-fed farming systems [smallholder rainfed, both humid and semi-arid
systems] in agro-ecological environments in which forest or trees plus tall
grass would be the natural climax vegetation [High potential + Forest
agriculture]. Targeted groups comprised:
- Poor rural
producers of SP to benefit from the increasing access to markets and
from the linkages with research. The project targeted women producer and
market groups to enhance the balance of the benefits from increased
access to markets between men and women. It was anticipated the
improvement in market access would contribute to the attainment of the
PMA objective of transformation farmers from subsistence to commercial agriculture.
- Resource poor
youth, female headed households and HIV/AIDS victim child-headed
households who do not produce SP would benefit through the rural SP
processing groups. Women would benefit more than men because of the
deliberate targeting.
- The project
was initially based on the new pro-Vitamin A rich SP varieties. So
consumers - particularly school children - would benefit from the more
nutritious SP and SP-products (men and women would benefit equally)
- Local artisans
would benefit from the increased demand for maintenance of SP processing
machines. (men were expected to directly benefit more than women)
- The school
clubs targeted rural communities for their activities so poor farmers in
these communities would benefit from the new knowledge (clubs targeted
mainly women and the youth farmers)
- Waged
labourers employed by the large food processors and processing machine
manufacturers would benefit from enhanced job security created by the
increased work that would become available (men expected to benefit
directly more than women).
Current Situation
Who are the Users?
- The project
culminated into Uganda Sweetpotato Development Association (USPDA) that
is an operational apex institutional framework for stakeholders
country-wide. USPDA is a recognized Ugandan Non-Profit Company Limited
by Guarantee that was registered in 2005 under the certificate number
74956. USPDA is a consortium of 43 farmer groups, 5 agricultural
researchers' institutions, 10 processors of agricultural produce and 5
trading firms that strive to use outputs of agricultural and industrial
research to improve the livelihoods of its members while conserving the
natural resource base.
- The five
methods and systems of processing sweetpotato chips and flour are used
by at least five rural CBOs and at industrial level, by at least three
medium to large-scale private firms. At rural level, the CBOs use the
outputs to process dried chips and flour that they market to urban food
processors.
- Nine
varieties that are suitable for export are increasingly the basis of
Uganda's sweetpotato exports mainly by one farmers association called Horticultural
Exporters' association (HORTEXA), a member of USPDA.
- Buganda Royal
Institute for Business and Technical Education adopted document
sweetpotato recipes as a basis for training over 100 catering students.
The institute also has a nutritional club where students learn about
sweetpotato from production to consumption.
- One company
that belongs to Buganda kingdom is collaborating with the Kingdom's
biggest university in an effort to start using sweetpotato for
bio-ethanol production
Where the outputs have been used:
Collaboration with PRAPACE has enabled rapid dissemination
of the project's researched results to many other end users not only in
Uganda, but also in other PRAPACE member countries as follows;
1. Mainly in Central Uganda
where the Buganda Cultural and Development Foundation (BUCADEF) has sensitized
and trained at least 25 potential end-users both at rural and industrial
levels in urban centres.
2. In Western Kenya, mainly by
a number of CBOs that are using OFSP to develop commercial products.
3. In Rwanda, mainly making
use value addition outputs.
4. In the Democratic Republic
of Congo, mainly making use of fresh roots storage technologies.
5. In North Western Tanzania
disseminating OFSP and export varieties are used.
Scale of Current Use:
- In Uganda,
1000 copies of a manual on SP production and marketing were published in
English and a local language (Luganda). These were all within the
project's lifetime distributed in all sweetpotato growing areas of
Uganda, North-western Tanzania and Western Kenya
- Several
sweetpotato-based recipes that were adapted and validated within the
project's life time were compiled in PRAPACE's book of recipes from East
and central Africa. This documentation is available for wider use in the
region.
- Five
workshops and many demonstrations were carried out, and two video
documentaries on SP technologies were broadcast world-wide on BBC-TV.
- The project's
activities were presented at various workshops, meetings, and seminars
in addition to being reported upon in all PRAPACE's reports
- The
outputs were also made available through a website (http://www.sweetpotatocoalition.org/)
that the project opened up and through PRAPACE's official website (http://www.asareca.org/). PRAPACE
helped much in maintaining the website.
Policy and Institutional Structures, and Key Components for Success:
- Networking
with the regional network PRAPACE facilitated mutual learning and
dissemination of the project outputs and hence provided a unique
opportunity for accelerated scaling up among its 10 member countries.
PRAPACE's significance to the consortium is best underscored by the role
it plays regionally to add value to what is being done nationally by the
various institutions of the member countries.
- Government
policy on agriculture emphasizing commercialization of this sector was
very instrumental for at one time, funds were even secure from the
National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) to assist in
promoting the project's outputs.
- Donor support
in favour of technology transfer. There are apparent concerns that
a lot of technologies have been developed but are shelved, thus leading
to increased donor interest in dissemination and adoption studies to
facilitate and enhance technology transfer, fortunately this agrees with
our scaling-up and scaling-out vision.
- Use of an
institution that is preferred and respected by the target people can be
of strategic importance. In this case use of the Buganda (located in
Central Uganda and with a population of over six million) monarchy's
institutions as the principal mover of the technology transfer project
was very effective in transferring research outputs. The successful and
cherished centuries-old traditional/cultural practices and traits of
traditional community mobilization and developmental guidance were much
exploited in formulating the project's implementation. The 'Royal
Reward System' whereby excellent performers, in recognition of
exemplary performance towards blending of culture with modern Science
and technology (individuals or groups/communities), are appropriately
honoured, was also a major implementation strategy that bore fruit.
- Prioritizing
broadening and strengthening partnerships (right from project planning,
technology development through marketing and utilization) particularly
with the private sector helped us create room to harness the nexus of
opportunities and resources offered by the rich mix of partners. In the
process because the partners share synergies, scarce resources are more
effectively used to impact more people's lives.
Lessons Learned and Uptake Pathways
Promotion of Outputs:
Currently, due to restricted funding, the USPDA
collaborates with PRAPACE, the "Participatory Market Chain Analysis (PMCA)
project and Buganda Royal Institute for Business and Technical Education
(BRIBTE) to promote the outputs mainly to potential end-users in Central
Uganda. Leaflets and posters are the major channel and these are distributed
to farmers and scientists and students/school children mainly in Buganda
Kingdom's academic institutions.
Potential Barriers Preventing Adoption of Outputs:
The following have been enumerated as the key
processing constraints in the sweetpotato sub-sector:
- Lack of strong farmer
groups/associations: This
has resulted in the small-scale farmers who are the major producers of
sweetpotato operating individually.
- Limited flow of
information: Its on the
prevailing market prices, expected market volumes, specifications and market
opportunities known to farmers at planting and harvesting of the crop.
- Lack of awareness of the
SP products: Potential
end-users of processing technologies and knowledge are not aware of their
existence.
- Lack of standards: The sub-sector is lacking both
production and marketing standards, causing unfair trade practices in most
markets.
- Inadequate financial
intermediaries: Inadequate financial resources coupled with the prevailing high commercial
banks interest rates.
- Low-level of product
development: For
example, virtually 95% of the sweetpotato produced in the project is freshly
consumed.
- Insufficient and poor
storage facilities: Poor
storage facilities have undermined faster bulking and consolidation.
- Poor road network
infrastructure: Poor
transport networks, limited communication infrastructure and networking
amongst the key participants in the supply chain.
- High costs of
electricity and inefficient utility service providers: Due to high electricity charges and
irregular power supply, processors use wood or charcoal fuel for frying, thus
leading to poor quality products and high losses.
How to Overcome Barriers to Adoption of Outputs:
There could be two strategies for mitigation. First in the short run, there is urgent need
tomotivate
discouraged producers by strengthening available market linkages in a way
that harnesses broadened partnerships that are geared to generating benefits
for putting back into the partnership to address the barriers and for
mutuality. This can be achieved in the following ways; (i) Market promotion,
(ii) Micro-enterprises development in urban and rural communities to
transform sweetpotato into value-added products for expanded markets, (iii)
Adoption and impact assessment studies of the disseminated outputs to
facilitate better planning for future technology deployment, (iv) Equity in
R&D endeavour, (v) Broadening and strengthening partnerships, (vi)
Seed/planting material production, (vii) Capacity building, (viii) Awareness
campaigns, and Policies, on use of sweetpotato products in the local industries,
on tax and harmonization of seed policy on variety release and
dissemination.
Second, In the long-run, develop innovative
ways of creating a lasting local market that is capable of absorbing large
quantities of sweetpotato and other agricultural produce via orienting
research towards the use sweetpotato for food, feed and energy. Increasing
attention should be given to transforming starchy and oily crops into
Bio-fuels to meet the region's increasing energy requirements.
Lessons Learned:
- Use of an
institution that is loved and respected by the target people can be of
strategic importance. Use of the Buganda ( over six million) monarchy's
institutions as the principal mover of the technology transfer project
was very effective in transferring research outputs.
- Broadening
and strengthening partnerships (right from project planning, technology
development through marketing and utilization) particularly with the
private sector should be priority for this creates room to harness the
nexus of opportunities and resources offered by the rich mix of
partners. Networking with the regional network PRAPACE facilitated
mutual learning and dissemination of the project outputs, hence provided
a unique opportunity for accelerated scaling up among its 10 member
countries.
- Farmer-to-farmers
technology transfer is a very effective means of technology
dissemination.
- Increasing
awareness to partnership and linkage with stakeholders including NPPs
outputs as in a strategic position to join efforts and expertise to make
better impacts in a short time with existing capacities of implementing
agencies.
- Donor support
in favour of technology transfer. There are apparent concerns that
a lot of technologies have been developed but are shelved leading to
increased donor interest.
- A growing
urban market for French fries and crisps. There is a very good
opportunity for the development of the potato sector.
- The promotion
of orange-fleshed sweetpotato as a dietary source of ß-carotene, a
precursor to vitamin A is a very important opportunity for the
sub-sector.
- Micro-enterprises
in urban and rural communities are coming up that will transform
sweetpotato into value-added products for expanded markets, promoting
partnership in sub-sector.
- Regionalization.
The network looks forward to take advantage of regional integration
arrangements such as the East African Community.
- Willingness
of staff scientists of implementing institutions in member countries to
participate in PRAPACE R & D activities.
Impacts On Poverty
Poverty Impact Studies:
To better
plan for future technology deployment, two Participatory Rural
Appraisals (PRA) and formal surveys were carried out in the eight target
districts of central Uganda (Luwero, Kiboga, Masaka, Mubende, Mukono,
Mpigi, Rakai and Wakiso). The studies were to assess adoption of the
intervening technologies and their impact on the livelihoods of rural
smallholder sweetpotato producers and medium-scale food processors to an
extent. The two PRAs/surveys were;
- Ahabwe G.,
Kyewalabye M., Berga L., Nsumba J., 2003. Adoption and impact study
assessment of efforts by BUCADEF to disseminate improved sweetpotato
varieties in central Uganda. A report of a survey that was carried
out at the end of PROJECT No. R8040/ZA0483: RAPID MULTIPLICATION
AND DISSEMINATION OF SWEETPOTATO VARIETIES WITH HIGH YIELD AND
ß-CAORTENE CONTENT in 2003 by BUCADEF's field staff under the
supervision of one subject matter specialist.
- Tindiwensi
K.C., Berga L., Nsumba J., 2005: Cost benefit analysis of sweetpotato
on farm enterprises in central Uganda: A report of a survey that was
carried out in 2005 by a hired consultant at the end of PROJECT No. R8273,
ZB0342: IMPROVING THE LIVELIHOODS OF SMALL-SCALE SWEET POTATO
FARMERS IN CENTRAL UGANDA THROUGH A CROP POST HARVEST-BASED INNOVATION
SYSTEM. This study was commissioned after realizing a number of gaps
with regard to the economic viability of enterprises that had been
promoted by previous interventions.
Among major findings:
In 50% of the
target districts of Luwero, Kiboga, Rakai and Mubende, sampled farmers
experienced low rates of poverty reduction compared to farmers in
Wakiso, Mpigi, Mukono and Masaka due to poor market access in the former
districts, as they are off the road.
- Snacks
are viable with a low start up capital and farmers can do this as a separate
on farm enterprise.
- Juice processing is
viable when combined with sale of roots. The profitability margin and net
income levels however are lower than when a farmer sells fresh roots
alone. Farmers are therefore better off selling fresh roots combined
with vines.
- Production of juice
and sweetpotato chips were for example found to be not viable as separate
enterprises. Chips combined with fresh roots was viable in the long term but
with poor margins. Farmers should avoid long term enterprises because of the
high start up capital
- Flour
whether from purchased or homegrown roots is viable in the long term with
good margins
- Flour from
purchased roots has better indicator levels than from homegrown roots
- Snacks are
profitable and suitable for small scale processors because of the low start
up capital
- The
production of fresh roots is financially viable even when the farmers incur
costs of buying the land
- All
technologies perform better when land is hired instead of buying
- Indicators
for the export market are better than for the local market
- Juice
production is not viable as a separate enterprise
- Juice
combined with fresh roots is viable but with reduced indicator levels
compared to fresh roots
- Chips
alone is not viable both in the short term and long term
- Chips
combined with fresh roots is viable in the long term but with poor margins
- Flour
whether from purchased or homegrown roots is viable in the long term with
good margins
- Flour from
purchased roots has better indicator levels than from homegrown roots
- Snacks are
profitable and suitable for small scale processors because of the low start
up capital
- Farmers
should avoid long term enterprises because of the high start up capital
At national
level in Uganda, a
three-phased sub-sector systems analysis of the sweetpotato sector was
carried out drawing upon a range of both secondary and primary sources.
The study; Sweetpotato sub-sector market survey in Uganda (by Kelly
W., Luwandagga D., Berga L., Nsumba J., 2003) used Holmatz's approach
and focused on both demand and supply covering the major production and
marketing sites in the country. It sought to understand the structure
and performance of sweetpotato markets in Uganda and also to identify
constraints and opportunities for commercialisation of sweetpotato
against a background of trade liberalization, poverty alleviation, food
insecurity and trade competitiveness.
Namutebi A.,
Berga L., Nsumba J., 2003: Investigating the potential of sea freighting
sweetpotato from East Africa. A technical report handed to the
sweetpotato coalition project.
At regional
level in together with PRAPACE and ECAPAPA (two networks of ASARECA), a
review of sub-sector status, constraints, opportunities and investment
priorities was carried out for potato and sweetpotato: Released in March
2005, this is an executive report of the potato and sweetpotato
sub-sector study conducted in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda, major
potato and sweetpotato producing countries in the ASARECA region. The
analysis had as overall objective to identify obstacles, opportunities
and the way forward for increased efficiency and competitiveness of the
two sub-sectors. In conceptualizing and commissioning the study, ECAPAPA
and PRAPACE worked closely together to identify a Resource Person who in
turn was able to work with a team of experts drawn from within the
PRAPACE network and the broader commodity sub-sectors. The study
approach utilized the ECAPAPA Policy Change Cycle model. ECAPAPA is an
ASARECA network focusing on policy matters. How the Poor have Benefited (including gender and other poverty groups):
A. Sweetpotato varieties for export
Improved incomes, lifestyle and a shift towards
commercialization: Male-dominated
export markets fetched the farmer about twice the
income derived by selling to local markets. From four of the target
districts, over 350 metric tons of sweetpotato worth about UK£ 178,000
were exported in 2003 and since then, export volumes have
on average been increasing by 14% per year fetching the national treasury
over UK£ 20,000/year
B. Post-harvest technologies and value-added
sweetpotato products.
Although at the moment value-added products and
processing technologies are steadily emerging, smallholder producers have not
yet felt much impact as these tended to reward less than what particularly
farmers expected.
Improved food security: On-farm post-harvest losses were in many cases
seen to fall from 30 to 20% through storage of fresh roots in pits for 2
months. Based on Uganda's per capita-consumption of 82.5 kg/year, it is
estimated that the amount of food saved through this reduction in loss can
feed three families of 10 for two months thus potentially enabling them to go
through two thirds of June-August dry season.
Improved household incomes: There is a gradually changing status
of sweetpotato from subsistence to a commercial commodity thus creating
earnings.
At rural level, two predominantly women CBOs
reported dodging extremely low prices at time of glut through production of
chips and flour that they sold to millers. They were poised to lose crops
worth UK£ 6,250 but through conversion to chips that they sold to a
poultry-feeds mill managed a 32% recovery.
Chips/flour processing however requires heavy start
up capital of over UK£ 550.
"Bajjabasaaga", one of the above-named CBOs that
has 60 members (43 women and 17 men) generates on average UK£ 150/month as
profit through the production and successful marketing of sweetpotato juice
and snacks to five rural schools Luweero district. Last year, business grew
by 3%).
Under some special government scheme (NAADS) the
CBO has been contracted as a service provider with regard to disseminating
value addition to agricultural produce.
Import substitution and rural industrialization
At the industrial scale mainly two private firms
have since 2001 been using OFSP and a number of recipes as a basis for their
commercial brands.
The medium-scale food processing company "MAGANJO"
in Kampala annually saves over UK£ 145,000 by using sweetpotato flour particularly
that the OFSP type to substitute wheat flour for its commercial bakery
products. The company buys about one ton of dried sweetpotato chips per
month, creating monthly demand for 3.4 tons kg of fresh sweetpotato, A
famous "Nutri-Porridge is also obtained. However since 2003, Maganjo's usage
of sweetpotato is sharply declining its demand is not fully met.
UGACHICK is another commercial firm that
picked great interest to use sweetpotato as a major ingredient for its
commercial brands that have markets in Uganda, Rwanda, D.R. Congo and
Tanzania. Whenever supply permits, the company includes 15% orange-fleshed
sweetpotato to mitigate shortcomings associated with maize and to improve the
nutritional quality of its products especially eggs. UGACHICK requires over
80 metric tons of dried sweetpotato per month, which demand has not been met
yet.
Environmental Impact
Direct and Indirect Environmental Benefits:
Positive impacts
- The
transformation of sweetpotato into an income generating activity might
lead farmers who have limited land to adopt better natural resource
management practices to enhance productivity
- Creation of
income generation opportunities for the youth may move them away from
activities that damage the environment like dealing in firewood from
public land and brick making
Adverse Environmental Impacts:
Potential Negative impacts
i. Sweetpotato is often
(especially during dry weather/offseason) grown in areas where inadequate
drainage, steeply sloping lands, population pressure and other social and physical
factors raise the potential for environmental problems. The project might
exacerbate this.
ii. Increased demand for
sweetpotato might cause forest clearing
Sweetpotato is increasingly becoming a fallback
source of carbohydrate for especially cash-strapped urban dwellers in East
Africa where what have been major food staples bananas and cassava, are
succumbing to disease epidemics. To ensure year-round supply of the crop in
urban areas, sweetpotato is often produced on wetlands that urbanization is
subjecting to increasing levels of pollution from Industrial and domestic
effluents
- Encroachment
on wetlands
- Health
hazards of deep fried products (junk food)
- Health
hazards of storage roots produced on polluted grounds
- Cross border
movement of diseases and pests
- Soil erosion
due to production in sloping lands
Coping with the Effects of Climate Change, or Risk from Natural Disasters:
YES. Poor people turn to sweet potato when climate
change or natural disasters occur because it is has the capacity to yield
large amounts of food from a small amount of land and within a short time (3
mths; faster than most other staple food crops). Sweet potato is also very
resilient in the face of erratic rainfall because of its indeterminate
growth, unlike, e.g., maize. Thus, NGOs have begun to provide sweet potato
planting material for refugees. Under such circumstances, improved crop and
postharvest management practices can provide the difference between a
successful harvest and crop failure.
The long-term bio-fuels related outputs have even
greater potential to increase poor peoples' capacity to cope with effects of
climate change because they are geared to producing and using cleaner
renewable energy that contributes less to global warming.
Relevant Research Projects,
with links to the
Research for Development (R4D) web site and Technical Reports:
| R4D |
Project Title |
Technical Report |
| R6087 |
Small-scale coconut processing. |
 |
| R6306 |
Field trials for quality assurance for horticultural exports. |
 |
| R6504 |
Expanded markets for locally produced cassava flours and starches in Ghana |
 |
| R6507 |
The extension of storage life and improvement of quality in fresh sweet potato through selection of appropriate cultivars and handling conditions. |
 |
| R6769 |
Investigating the potential of cultivar differences in susceptibility to sweet potato weevil as a means of control |
58 MB |
| R7151 |
Overcoming information constraints: improving horticultural marketing and technical information flows to smallholders |
 |
| R7418 |
Development of new market opportunities, to increase the contribution that cassava makes to sustainable rural livelihoods |
28 MB |
| R7493 |
Enhancing the food security of the peri-urban and urban poor through improvements to the quality, safety and economics of street-vended foods. |
 |
| R7494 |
Optimisation of horticulture research and uptake in India through the development of technical and management systems with public and private sector partners |
 |
| R7498 |
Maximising incomes from sweet potato production as a contribution to rural livelihoods |
 |
| R7502 |
Optimising institutional arrangements for demand-driven post-harvest research, delivery, uptake and impact on the livelihoods of the poor, through public and private sector partnerships |
 |
- Post-harvest innovations
in innovation: reflections on partnership and learning.
|
 |
| R7520 |
Sweet potato cultivars with improved keeping qualities for East Africa |
 |
- Sweetpotato Postharvest Assessment. Experiences from East Africa.
|
|
|
 |
| R8113 |
Improved agricultural rural transport for Kenya |
 |
| R8114 |
Improved food crops marketing though appropriate transport for poor farmers in Uganda |
 |
- Improved food crop marketing through appropriate transport for poor farmers in Uganda. Baseline study based on Participatory Rural Appraisals and Household Questionnaire Surveys in Nine Sub-counties of Iganga, Kasese, and Katakwi Districts.
|
 |
- Rural transport and livelihoods in Uganda.
|
 |
- Partnership building and participatory monitoring and evaluation of sustainable rural transport in Uganda
|
 |
| R8182 |
Strengthening technical innovation systems in potato-based agriculture in Bolivia: Bolivia Initiative |
 |
| R8250 |
Decentralised market information service in Lira District, Uganda |
 |
| R8268 |
Sustainable uptake of cassava as an industrial commodity.
Report Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
|
 |
| R8270 |
Developing food safety strategies and procedures through reduction of food hazards in street-vended foods to improve food security for consumers, street food vendors and input suppliers |
 |
| R8271 |
Promoting improved food safety management for small-scale farmers and their commercial exporters who are involved in horticultural exports |
 |
| R8272 |
Improving food safety of informally vended foods in Southern Africa |
 |
| R8273 |
Improving the livelihoods of small-scale sweet potato farmers in Central Uganda through a crop post harvest-based innovation system |
 |
| R8274 |
Improvement of maize marketing through adoption of improved post-harvest technologies and farmer group storage: a case study of Kiboga and Apac districts |
 |
| R8275 |
Farmer Organisations for market access |
 |
| R8278 |
Evaluation and promotion of crop protection practices for "clean" seed yam production systems in Central Nigeria |
 |
| R8302 |
Participatory breeding of superior, mosaic disease-resistant cassava: validation, promotion and dissemination |
 |
| R8303 |
Maximising, disseminating and promoting the benefits to farmers of cassava varieties resistant to cassava mosaic disease |
 |
| R8366 |
Policy and strategy for increasing income and food security for poor farmers in Nepal and South Asia through improved crop management of high yielding chickpea in rice fallows. |
 |
| R8402 |
STEP tools to package and deliver information for local use |
 |
| R8418 |
Promotion and development of the participatory market chain approach (PMCA) in Uganda |
 |
| R8421 |
Making informed choices: facilitating farmers' enterprise selection process in Uganda |
|
| R8422 |
Improving farmer and other stakeholders' access to quality information and products for pre- and post- harvest maize systems management in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. |
 |
| R8431 |
Management and control - essential features for continued access by small-scale growers to EU fresh produce markets |
 |
| R8498 |
Analysis of promotion and uptake pathways for CPH research |
 |
|
For relevant research projects, with links to further information 
Geographical regions included:
Congo DR,
Kenya,
Rwanda,
Tanzania,
Uganda,
Target Audiences for this content:
Crop farmers, Processors, |