Seed-tuber production
schemes are helping farmers in Kenya and Uganda to produce quality potato
planting material. Previously, because of the difficulties smallholders faced
in purchasing good quality seed-tubers, they found themselves forced to
depend on tubers saved from their own harvest. Yet infected home-saved tubers
often carried bacterial wilt over to the next crop. A method known as the 'seed-plot'
technique now allows smallholders with limited access to land to multiply
seed-tubers effectively, lessening the impact of home-saved seed practices.
Farmer associations, market chains, and communication and management
structures support these production schemes. Materials designed to strengthen
farmers' knowledge of marketing, finance and group dynamics help to ensure
success.
Project Ref: CPP10:
Topic: 1. Improving Farmers Livelihoods: Better Crops, Systems & Pest
Management
Lead Organisation: Central Science Laboratory, UK
Source: Crop Protection Programme
Description
Research Programmes:
Crop Protection Programme
With additional support in the first year of R8104
from DFID Uganda as part of Livelihood Initiative for Eastern Uganda [LIFE]
Project 1st July 1999- 30th June 2003.
Additional support for quality management training
[R8435] was provided by DANIDA ASPS.
Relevant Research Projects:
|
Institute |
Contact
person |
R8435 Sustainable Potato Seed-Tuber
Management and Marketing through Commercialization |
Central
Science Laboratory, UK |
Julian Smith |
AT Uganda,
Uganda |
Rita
Laker-Ojok |
NARO, Uganda |
William
Wagoire |
MAAIF, Uganda |
Grace Akoa |
SACRED Africa |
Eusebius J. Mukhwana |
R8104:
Promoting Potato Seed-Tuber Management For Increased Ware Yields in
Kapchorwa District, Eastern Uganda |
CAB
International, UK |
* |
Central
Science Laboratory, UK |
Julian Smith |
AT Uganda,
Uganda |
Rita
Laker-Ojok |
NARO, Uganda |
William
Wagoire |
Makerere
University, Uganda |
Adipala
Ekwamu |
R8016:
Promotion of on-farm small-scale seed potato production in low input
farming communities in Kabale district, Uganda |
CIP |
Charles
Crissman |
CAB International,
UK |
* |
Africare,
Uganda |
|
NARO, Uganda |
William
Wagoire |
Uganda Seed
Potato Producers Association UNSPPA |
|
PRAPACE,
Uganda |
Berga Lemaga |
R7858:
Promoting potato seed-tuber management for increased ware yields in Kenya,
Uganda and the Republic of South Africa
October 2000
- March 2002 |
CAB
International, UK |
* |
KARI, Kenya |
Kinyua Murimi |
KEPHIS, Kenya |
Gladys Maina |
CIP, Kenya |
Charles
Crissman |
PRAPACE |
Berga Lemaga |
NARO, Uganda |
William
Wagoire |
Africare,
Uganda |
|
ARC - VOPI,
RSA |
|
* Julian Smith moved from CAB International to
Central Science Laboratory during the course of these projects [April 2005]
** Some outputs and comments relate to earlier CPP
project R5310 [1992-96] and R6629 [1996-200]
*** More specific information on project R8435 is
to be found within the submission of AT Uganda [Sustainable potato seed -
tuber management and marketing through commercialisation]
Research Outputs, Problems and Solutions:
Purpose: This project cluster focused on potato and the benefit to smallholders in using clean [pest-free] seed-tubers [1].
Problem statement: The project cluster recognised as the main
constraint the limited supply of quality seed-tubers [formal
sector] to smallholders for ware production, and the common
practice of farmers to home-save seed [informal seed] that carries the
risk of 'concentrating' seed-borne pests. Bacterial Wilt [BW
[Ralstonia solanacearum]] was identified as the main seed-borne
pest. Research focused on potato production in Kenya and Uganda.
Compounding constraints were recognised within the
marketing of potato seed and the absence of a market pull to command a price differential between formal and informal seed, linked to
constraints in distribution.
Project Cluster Outputs:
- The
development of a biocontrol agent [BCA] for the control of
Bacterial Wilt in potato. Component outputs:
- Genetic engineering of a
non-pathogenic mutant of R. solanaceraum [= BCA] effective at reducing
incidence of BW.
- Permission for in-country
testing of the BCA in Kenya and Republic of South Africa [RSA];
undertaken in RSA but not in Kenya. Only the second approval for GMO testing in Kenya and instrumental in establishing the national biosafety
legislation.
- Methods for monitoring [epidemiology] BW and BCA in soil that revealed some crops suppress soil populations of
BW. If validated under field conditions, would place crop rotation
recommendations [soil health] on a scientific platform.
- The
development of Best Practice seed-tuber multiplication protocols for phased multiplication of seed and ware production by
medium and small-scale landholders. Component outputs:
Phase 1:
- Distinct from ware, ridge/furrow seed-tuber management practices for optimised multiplication of basic seed;
sorting of harvested seed by size for sale.
- Development of quality-assured,
traceable systems of seed production and a farmer-based decision
framework for field and post harvest pest thresholds [voluntary standards].
- Development of an on-farm
method for the detection of BW within seed.
Phase 2:
- The development and
promotion of Seed Plot Technique [SPT] for optimised quality seed
[Phase 1] and land utilisation by smallholders for further seed production
and ware production.
- The
development of farmer association, market chain, communication and management structures for commercial seed and ware potato
production. Component outputs:
- Seed communication/distribution
systems [e.g. Parish
Development Committees] that identified the poorest-of-the-poor.
- Development of farmer
association constitutions [e.g. Kapchorwa Seed Potato Association].
- Use of Safe Havens for seed sharing amongst 'trusted' sources
- Market branding of farmer association [e.g. farmer
association KASPPA logo and bag] and introduction of collective marketing and pricing structures by quality-criteria.
- Development of Best Practice capacity strengthening materials for farmer associations in
marketing, finance and group dynamics.
[1] The term seed and seed-tuber is
used throughout, but it is recognised that technically this project cluster
delivered tubers of a recommended size and low pest status that were suitable
for planting.
[An overview of these projects is to be found
at: Smith, J.J. [2005]. Research
approaches to improve crop productivity using potato seed health. In
proceeding of Pathways out of Poverty, Eds. D. Harris, J.I. Richards, P.
Silverside, A.F. Ward & J.R. Witcombe. Aspects of Applied
Biology 75, 23-36]
Types of Research Output:
Product |
Technology |
Service |
Process
or Methodology |
Policy |
Other
|
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
Major Commodities Involved:
This project cluster focused on the commodity
potato seed and, to a lesser extent, potato ware, and extends to [outputs]
capacity building in bacteriology, development of a biocontrol agent,
development of GMO biosafety assessments and indirectly legislation, pest
control practices and quality/traceability management systems, and
establishment and function of farmer associations through development of an
innovation platform.
Research approaches and capacity building realised
in bacteriology within KARI can support investigation on the bacterial and/or
soil microbiota constraints of other commodities, notably Banana Xanthomonas
Wilt of banana. This project cluster recognises soil health as a
generic theme. Experiences gained in working with GMOs are applicable
to GMO biosafety legislation and environmental impact testing for soils in
general.
The Best Practice seed quality and traceability
outputs generated are widely applicable to 1] other seed crops, especially
vegetatively propagated, were pests are transmitted with planting material
and the practice of farmer-saved planting material are dominant over formal
systems and/or 2] where a quality product can realise a higher market
value. Similarly, the procedures and lessons learnt in establishing the
framer associations [KASPPA and ware marketing groups] have generic value to
associations supporting other commodities and their functioning.
Collectively these outputs, or the experiences gained, can be applied to any
system where a quality product supported by a policy or voluntary standard is
appropriate and can command a higher market value through promotion and
collective marketing by an association.
Production Systems: 
Semi-Arid |
High
potential |
Hillsides |
Forest-Agriculture |
Peri-urban |
Land
water |
Tropical
moist forest |
Cross-cutting |
| |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
Farming Systems: 
Smallholder
rainfed humid |
Irrigated |
Wetland
rice based |
Smallholder
rainfed highland |
Smallholder
rainfed dry/cold |
Dualistic |
Coastal
artisanal fishing |
| |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Potential for Added Value:
Areas where value may be realised in clustering other project cluster outputs with this project cluster outputs [addressing additional constraints] are outlined below.
- KASPPA remains actively producing and
selling seed amongst its membership [operating safe havens], but is not
producing enough to sell a significant volume outside of the
organisation. Limited availability and access to basic seed presents a
significant obstacle to the expansion of KASPPA.
- The policy position in Kenya and Uganda
[and East Africa] on seed-tuber pest standards is weak; dialogue with
policy-makers on voluntary/more appropriate standards is needed.
- Initially, the project focused on the
push of seed, with attention given to the pull for ware and ware markets
towards the latter stages. This innovation platform remains to be
substantiated with additional players and durable linkages through to main
ware markets. Moreover, farmer through to marketer awareness on how to
work an innovation platform remains weak.
- Smallholders use diverse risk management
strategies based on the production of many crops and livestocks, and income
realised from outside of agriculture. The value of an association is
more likely to be bought into by farmers if it is likewise pluralistic and
not focused on a single commodity. For example, although potato is
recognised by farmers as a higher value crop than maize, it is viewed as too
high risk for single-enterprise due to input costs and risk of pests.
Thus added value from other project clusters would
be realised where those outputs addressed the above constraints on 1] basic
[foundation] seed production, 2] policy on pest thresholds, 3 & 4]
Development of innovation platforms and functionalising farmer associations, providing
diverse interests in terms of crops and market-chain provisions.
The below project numbers appear to share themes with
this project cluster where value [2-way] may be realised.
Seed health policy: R8312/R8439/R7571; R8447; R8480
Soil Health and Pest Control: R8453/R7566; R8414/R7965/R7568/R7569/R8316;
R8478/R8316/R7568/R7965; R8435/R8014/R7858/R8016; R8452/R8215; R8296;
R8449/R8212; R8342/R7567/R7529/R7972; R8513; R8443/R8044; R7778;
R8436/R8194/R7564; R8480; R6580; R7962. R8436/R8194/R7564
Seed Production and Quality: R104/R8435; R8442/R8105; R8312/R8439/R7571;
R8445/R8030;R6733; R8243; R8416/R7503; R8415; R7445/R6811; R8040;
R8443/R8044; R8485/8182; R8480; R8273; R8417/R8341 Also Various PSRP
projects.
Production and Market chain promotion: R8104/R8435; R8442/RR8105; R8219/R7405;
R8445/R80830/R6733; R8429/R8281; R8485/R8182; R8182/R8418; R8275; R7151;
R8274/R8498; R8113; R6344/R7013/R7668; R7496; R8250; R8114; R8421;
R7520/R6769/R6507; R7494; R7498; R8422.
Validation
How the outputs were validated:
Output and How Validated
|
Who Validated
|
Where
|
When
|
Biocontrol agent [BCA]
Smith, J.J. & Saddler, G.S. [2001].
The use of avirulent mutants of Ralstonia solanacearum to control
Bacterial Wilt disease. In Biotic Interactions in Plant-Pathogen
Associations. Eds. M.J. Jeger & N. Spence. CAB International,
Wallingford, UK, pp. 159-176. |
Development of the BCA [R5310] |
INRA & CABI
[research] |
France |
1992-96 |
Validation of BCA under contained-use conditions [R6629] |
CABI & ARC VOPI
[research] |
UK & RSA |
1996-2000 |
Approval for in-country testing of BCA in Kenya [R7858] |
National Biosafety Council |
Kenya |
1995 - 2002 |
Biosafety assessments on survival in soil and other crop roots of
BCA and R. solanacearum [R7858] |
KARI & CABI
[research] |
UK |
2000-02 |
BCA application for in-country testing used as training aid on
biosafety risk assessments for African biosafety stakeholders under ABSP I
project [USAID] |
ABSP 1 partners and national receiving training |
Pan Africa |
2002 |
External End of Project Review [R6629] commissioned by CPP.
Recommended progressing BCA testing in Kenya |
Malcolm Blackie, Fred Wangati, and Peter Mills |
Kenya |
2000 |
Best Practice protocols for seed production by medium-sized
landholders [primary multipliers]
S. Namise & J. Smith [2004]. Promoting potato seed tuber
management for increased ware yields n Kapchorwa, Eastern Uganda.
Uganda Journal of agricultural science, Vol 9:1 723-730 |
Protocol provides a physical record on quality assurance and
traceability of produce, and includes components of field and storage
inspection and setting of pest tolerance threshold. Protocol
developed through on-farm development with farmers [28] that subsequently
formed KASPPA [see below]. |
KASPPA [farmers]; AT Uganda [NGO]; CABI/CSL [research] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2002-06 |
Field incubation method for on-farm testing of Bacterial Wilt.
Simple technology appropriate for farmers and the detection of latent
infection of potato with Bacterial Wilt. Validated over 6 seasons of
production through comparisons with ELISA tests carried out at MAAIF |
KASPPA [farmers]; MAIFF [MoA] AT Uganda [NGO]; CABI/CSL [research] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2002-06 |
Decision-making framework for acceptance and rejection of potato as
seed: Main criteria for acceptance / rejection to date has been level
of Bacterial Wilt that is set at 2%. This has been used for 5
generations of seed production |
KASPPA [farmers]; AT Uganda [NGO]; CABI/CSL [research] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2002-06 |
Seed Plot Technique [SPT]
Kinyua, Z.M., Smith, J.J., Lung'aho, C., Olanya, M., and Priou, S.
[2001]. On-farm successes and challenges of producing Bacterial
Wilt-free tubers in seed plots in Kenya. Proceedings of 5th Triennial Congress of the African Potato Association, 29 May-2 June,
Kampala, Uganda. Published in African Crop Science Journal 9[1],
279-285. |
Development and initial validation of SPT: The SPT is a flat bed
seed nursery planted at 20 x 20cm. It is more suited for use with
farmers of limited land and smaller tubers [<30mm] of known good
health. The SPT was developed through DFID CPP R6629 and R7858 under
on-farm trials [6 farmers over 8 seasons] at Njabini Kenya.
Treatments comprised SPT and farmer-saved seed, against certified seed as
the control. A substantial data set was realised through these trials |
KARI & CABI
[research] |
Kenya, Njabini |
1998-2002 |
Further validation of SPT under R8016. Various demonstrations
and training activities located through the Africare FFS programme for the
region exposed the SPT to a reported 1129 farmers [FTR R8016]. |
Farmers [FFS]; CIP/NARO/CABI [research]; AFRICARE [NGO] |
Kabale, Uganda |
March 2002-03 |
Further validation of SPT under R8104 & R8435. Various
demonstrations and training activities; the seed distribution scheme from
the Primary Seed Multipliers targeted the poorest-of-the-poor and women. |
Farmer [co-ordinated as grower groups]; At Uganda [NGO] CABI/CSL
[research] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2002-06 |
External End of Project Review [R6629] commissioned by CPP.
Recommended promotion of SPT within region. |
Malcolm Blackie, Fred Wangati, and Peter Mills |
Kenya |
2000 |
Farmer Associations and community communication structures - see
submission by AT Uganda for more detail |
Development of Kapchorwa Seed Potato Producers association and a
market brand: KASPPA evolved during the project from the initial
primary seed grower farmers. The function of KASPPA is underpinned by
a constitution that was developed and modified during the project and in
light of experience. KASPPA has a market brand that it uses on its
official letters and the bags for the sale of seed. |
Farmers; AT Uganda [NGO] CABI/CSL [research] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2002-2006 |
Parish Development Councils: 8 Parish Development Councils were
established to agree on the seed dissemination pathways of seed, targeting
poorest-of-the-poor and women |
Farmers; AT Uganda [NGO] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2002-2006 |
Ware Grower associations [R8104]: 4 potato marketing
associations were established with a total of 156 paid-up members [Dec
2005]. |
Farmers; AT Uganda [NGO] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2004-2006 |
Capacity building in
association management, quality control, book-keeping, and project
planning: see submission by AT Uganda [R8435] |
Farmers; SACRED Africa; AT Uganda [NGO] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
2004-2006 |
Cereal banks:
see submission by AT Uganda [R8435] |
|
|
|
Where the Outputs were Validated:
See above
Current Situation
Output and How Used
|
By Whom
|
Where
|
What Scale
|
Biocontrol agent [BCA]: |
The BCA was not tested in Kenya and is held as freeze dried culture
within the CABI Genetic Resource Collection, UK |
NA |
CABI, UK |
NA |
The BCA application was instrumental in driving the formation of the
national biosafety legislation within Kenya. Kenya has the most
advanced GMO R&D within East Africa. In turn other African
nations have looked to emulate Kenya in progressing biosafety legislation
and GMO research, notably Uganda. The BCA application remains in the
public domain and is used for training purposes [USAID ABSP I project] |
National Biosafety Council of Kenya; USAID supported ABSP I project |
Africa |
Kenya mainly |
Biosafety assessments on survival in soil and other crop roots of
BCA and R. solanacearum [R7858]. These research data were not
validated under field conditions, although the research approach was taken
up under the CIP managed DFID project CRF CRF7862[c] in Bolivia and Peru. |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Best Practice protocols for seed production by medium-sized
landholders [Primary Seed Multipliers] |
Best Practices use by KASPPA. A visit to KASPPA in Oct 2006
substantiated the protocols use outside of project support by approx. 50%
of KASPPA members. Notably KASPPA members within Kaproron sub-county
were effectively using the scheme. |
KASPPA [Kaproron sub-district] |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
Approx. 12 of the 28 KASPPA members |
Field incubation for Bacterial Wilt |
As above |
|
|
Acceptance/rejection of seed based on pest thresholds: In
discuss with the KASPPA farmers [Oct 2006] its was apparent that KASPPA was
not selling seed outside the association but was operating a Safe Haven
environment for the movement of seed amongst members |
KASPPA |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
KASPPA members [24] |
KASPPA have procured for the 2006B season potato seed from NARO and
are preparing to purchase a larger volume for the 2007A season.
KASPPA has submitted a tender to become the private sector service
provider to NAADS to supply seed and to offer training to Kaproron
sub-county that selected potato as a promoter enterprise |
KASPPA |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
38 80kg bags of see-tubers shared between KASPPA members |
Further and by good example, aspects of the scheme have influenced
the NARO national seed programme at Kabale that now actively sort and sell
seed by size categories and is more aware of traceability of produce.
NARO has also increased its level of surveillance for Bacterial Wilt
through ELISA testing |
NARO |
Kabale, Uganda |
Not known |
Seed Plot Technique |
|
|
|
The SPT has been exposed to farmers in Kenya [Njabini] and Uganda
[Kabale & Kapchorwa]. Its use has remained as intended: for
the safe multiplication of seed tubers by smallholder farmers with limited
access to land and good quality seed, providing a flush-out mechanism for
seed that lessons the impact of home saved seed practices. No direct
measures of adoption are available, however, the following appears to be a
realistic measure of adoption at the institute and farm level |
|
|
|
Institute level: The SPT is reported as a central part of the
training activities routinely provided by NARO [Uganda] and forms a
component of the ASARECA project IRC04_C4-05 implemented in Kenya, Ugandan
and Burundi. |
NARS and NGOs |
Kenya, Uganda, Burundi and Ethiopia |
Demonstration plots and FFS |
Farm level: No quantitative date is available. It is
reported that farmers within Kabale use the method, however, adoption of
the method has not been strong in Kapchorwa and Njabini although potato
production for all regions has increased as a result of the projects.
By example in Njabini the farmers involved in the project have formed an
association called Jetegemee Agriculture and General Development Self Help
group [JAGED-SHG] that continue to actively produce potato seed and ware. |
Farmers |
Kenya, Uganda |
Not known |
KASPPA members are providing services to farmers on seed
multiplication and proper management of the potato crop |
|
|
|
Farmer Associations and Community communication structures - see
submission by AT Uganda for more detail |
KASPPA - see above |
|
|
|
Marketing Associations: As of Oct 06 the Kapchorwa marketing
groups continue to buy and sell produce; mainly maize, beans, and wheat,
and look to add value by sort and correct storage. The marketing
groups report holding regular meetings to update the members on the
business transactions and were able to demonstrate the effective use of
their books of accounts. They have not been trading in potato because
of the perishable nature of the commodity: see submission by AT Uganda
[R8435] |
Farmers Marketing Initiative Groups |
Kapchorwa, Uganda |
156 members |
Cereal banks:
see submission by AT Uganda [R8435] |
|
|
|
Policy and Institutional Structures, and Key Components for Success:
The success of the work undertaken on the BCA was
muted by the failure to undertake efficacy tests in-country due to an absence
existing biosafety legislation and the time this took to be
implemented. Whilst the appropriateness of the institutes that pushed
for the biosafety approval is recognised, the gaining of approval of the BCA
application was as much down to the persistence of individuals 'championing
a cause'.
The success of the potato multiplication outputs
has been based on the robust partnership of technical and local NGO partners,
with the full participation of [= project level platform]. A clear
vision for the project has always been apparent; the project although working
with farmers has never gone in with an overt FFS approach or an open-ended
offer to farmers on how to progress ideas. The technical and NGO
partners have been very purposeful and hands-on in what needs to be achieved,
but have also been effective in evolving the proposed technologies to the
interests of farmers.
Capacity building has taken place at various
levels, between the project partners and between the project partners and
farmers. Particularly the technical partners have worked well with the
NGO in communicating agronomic and pest issues that the NGO in turn has
communicated to the farmers.
A further key factor has been the availability of
clean seed from the NARs of Kenya [KARI] and Uganda [NARO] without which the
starting material would most probably have been infected by Bacterial Wilt,
with resulting crop failure. However, if the NARs are the correct source
of commercial seed is questioned - see later sections. The additional
institutional linkage with NAADS has provided a necessary platform for
further and sustained development of KASPPA. These have represented the
main institute platforms though the absence of involving the MoA inspection
services [KEPHIS; MAAIF] more strongly should be noted.
The value of forming farmer associations [=
community level platform] so as to have a strong position to negotiate with
traders, credit-providers and in accessing markets is borne out by this
project cluster. Most notably the ability to link with NAADS is only
possible through such structures. The strength of the NGO, AT Uganda,
in motivating and training the association members has been a key factor.
Lessons Learned and Uptake Pathways
Promotion of Outputs:
The BCA and related Bacterial Wilt epidemiological
methods is not being promoted to the author's knowledge. Aspects of the
epidemiology research was promoted in Bolivia and Peru [CRF7862[c]], but it
is not known to what extent these are continuing.
The main promotion of the potato SPT is taking
place under the ASARECA project [IRC04_C4-05]. This project has the SPT
as a training component for farmers and is due to be implemented in Kenya,
Uganda and Burundi. In Uganda 10 farmer groups with a composition of
120 females and 82 males are involved, with similar scales of promotion in
Kenya and Burundi.
The Best Practice protocols for seed multiplication
and ware production are not being promoted actively through any other project
to the author's knowledge.
The Best practice materials for business management
and farmer association function are being promoted in Uganda by AT Uganda
through projects supported by USAID [APEP] and DANIDA [APSP]. See
submission by AT Uganda for more information.
Potential Barriers Preventing Adoption of Outputs:
| Current constraint to adoption |
Way forward |
BCA and related epidemiology methods: The BCA was
reviewed positively under R6629 and recommended for development.
However, this was requiring of a longterm investment that was not seen as
appropriate for the CPP during the programmes closing phases.
Interest was expressed by USAID ABSP, however, this programme placed
emphasis on crop biotechnologies. |
The value of the BCA and the epidemiology methods for Bacterial Wilt
should be viewed separately. The value of the BCA to Kenya needs to
be revisited and reprioritised. To see this product through to a
commercial outcome requires a specific investment with a vision for
development of 4yrs+. The BW epidemiology tools could form part of a
soil health theme, linking with other RNRRS outputs [e.g. maize Grey leaf
Spot [R7566/R8453] and Bean [R8478/R8316 etc]. |
Understanding risk strategies of farmers: As a generic
observation a lesson from this project cluster has been the shortcoming of
trying to promote a single commodity amongst farmers that manage their
household risk through multiple interests. Often it was found that
'non-project' priorities confounded project goals. For example potato
was seen as a higher risk crop than maize and therefore maize was preferred
despite potato being recognised as more profitable; and in the context of
associations the cost of school fees often prevented farmers paying
membership fees in a timely way. |
Farmer associations provide the ideal platform for donor investment
to articulate ideas and technologies, but experience has shown that such
dialogue needs to blend more with the interests and risk strategies of
farmers. Towards the end of these projects marketing groups were
established for the collective purchase and sale of various commodities [not
just potato]. This markedly improved the commitment and interest of
the group members. Ideas were also promoted for paying association
fees through a return at harvest of production proportional to the harvest
[a levy], rather than a cash sum. The placement of membership fees at
a time that is affordable to farmers is critical. |
Dysfunction within associations: Experiences from this
project cluster has shown that, whilst agronomic ideas can be successfully
adapted and adopted by farmers, the expectations held by farmers in forming
an association are poorly formed and the training provided in marketing,
group dynamics and collective marketing are poorly understood and
applied. It was noted that association members to KASPPA were all
farmers despite the constitution providing for provision of other partners
that would be more akin to an innovation platform. In this the
expectation of an individual in becoming an association members [the 2-way
obligation and value] is not well understood by farmers. |
Under R8104 and R8435 various role-play activities were used to
illustrate to KASPPA the problems they were facing with the way they were
working their association. Greater emphasis needs to be placed on
group dynamics of an association and its membership, building deep-rooted
understanding of the value and obligation of being within an
association. Model association formats [constitutions and
partnerships] that build innovative-type platforms need to be developed
that are sensitive to the risk management strategies of farmers and other
stakeholder members. Within the innovation platform all appropriate
partners as form the production and marketing chain need to be identified,
and the benefit and risk residing within the chain must be fairly
distributed throughout. |
Commercial basis for seed: For the formation of a
viable potato seed industry compelling evidence to farmers is still needed
on the value [increased quality and ware yields] of planting clean potato
seed as then commands a price differential between quality-assured seed and
informal seed. The field trials conducted under R6629 revealed that
over 80% of yield variation was accounted for by abiotic soil factors [e.g.
fertility and water retention] and seasonal factors [e.g. rainfall,
temperature], with pest factors being a relatively minor factor. |
There is a thin line between farmer participation, on-farm research
and achieving the level of trial management [quality control] needed to realise
the desired outcome. Greater investment needs to be apportioned
within projects to trial management. With a view to wider
dissemination, greater value is also to be realised through the robust
collating of quantitative data that is statistically sound and report
writing. |
Appropriate policies on seed health: At the policy level, the
failure to develop a coherent and well consider certification
scheme/voluntary standard for seed-tubers results in various barriers
in furthering a seed industry. For example, it cannot be expected of
the private sector to invest in potato seed whilst seed health standards
support a zero tolerance for Bacterial Wilt that, for the main, is
unattainable in the near-term for developing nations. Accordingly,
basic seed amongst East African nations continues to be produced through
the respective NARs potato programme that can only realise limited
production and presents a confused role for the NARs as researcher and
private sector producer. |
A clear change in the policy relating to the health off certified
seed is required that accommodates aspirations for local or regional/export
trade. A project under ECAPAPA [PRAPACE = contact point] is now
starting that seemingly may address this issue. Unfortunately to date
opportunity to feed in the experiences of KASPPA to these discussions has
not been realised. Within the scope of this analysis consideration is
needed as to the opportunity and positioning of the private sector,
foremost as a seed producers, but also as inspectors of seed health with
costs integrated into a supply chain. This review must embrace the
latest technologies for seed testing and the sampling strategies required
to support a policy position. |
Lessons Learned:
Placing value on evidence-based scientific and
commercial principles has been foremost in decision-making.
It has not been the objective of the projects to
directly deliver the outputs to the poorest people and thus robust
quantitative data at the level of use by the poor is not available against
all outputs.
Earlier phases focused on technologies [BCA] and
basic research questions that, in addition to the direct outputs that were to
be taken forward by NARs, built institutional capacity that can be
demonstrated as having subsequent value through other potato related projects
and other commodities. Capacity building has by example enabled KEPHIS
and KARI to better manage Bacterial Wilt within the pelargonium industry
within Kenya, protecting large-revenue export markets.
The work under R8104 and R8435 mainly focused on
the Primary Seed Multipliers that were medium-sized landholders [not
small-scale farmers]. Subsequent dissemination of the seed was then
targeted [cascaded] to more numerous poor people and women groups.
Supporting mass dissemination of training material went alongside these seed
dispersals. The training of trainers was effectively used as the
mechanism of training. Critical in this process of upscaling was the
role of the Parish Development Councils that enabled the effective targeting
of smallscale farmers and the formation of farmers as associations that
provide coherent group structures for interaction. Though all aspects
of the seed and ware production were participatory with farmers, project
activities were never structured as FFS and were from the outset progressing
commercial interests amongst the farmers.
In summary, by two very different aspects of the
project, the approach to targeting the poorest-of-the-poor has focused on
stakeholders above this stakeholder tier and in the case of the potato
dissemination with women as a recognised target group.
Impacts On Poverty
Poverty Impact Studies:
One formal impact survey was conducted at the conclusion
of R8104:
Impact Survey Report on Promoting Potato Seed Tuber
Management for increased Ware Yields in Kapchorwa, Eastern Uganda. Sarah Namisi, Rita Laker-Ojok, and Julian Smith. December 2004 [Draft Report]
A total of 116 beneficiaries and 240 non-beneficiaries
were surveyed; the survey include a cost benefit analysis:
The cost-benefit analysis of seed potato production
in Kapchorwa was calculated with KASPPA seed multipliers in a participatory
manner with technical guidance from the project. The production cost of
seed production for one acre was estimated to be USh8,681/= per bag and
USh11,000/= per bag when marketing costs were included. With the value
of seed averaging USh25,000 this resulted in a net profit per bag of
USh14,000/=, a very high return on investment.
This survey realised a substantial data set.
Resources available did not allow for the fullest of analysis.
How the Poor have Benefited (including gender and other poverty groups):
The quantitative results of the impact survey
indicated that the project R8104 had made an impact amongst the Primary Seed
Multipliers and the small-scale farmers that received seed from the Primary
Seed multiplies in terms of
- Area of land cultivated
that was now higher amongst beneficiaries
- Production patterns towards
cultivation of potato; displaced banana production, with maize and beans
remaining as the crops having the largest cultivated area.
- Production practices for
potato production reflecting adoption of advocated Best Practices
- Eating patterns that were
now more varied and included a higher consumption of potato; 80% of
beneficiaries households reported higher levels of food security
- Income source, with potato
realising a higher % of household income (34% increasing to 74%); with 42% of
respondents reporting selling potato for cash
In addition to adoption amongst the project
partners, the impact survey assessed the diffusion of the technologies beyond
the project beneficiaries amongst neighbouring farmers and farmers of
neighbouring villages and parishes. These data supported a trend of
adoption by non-beneficiaries that was strongest amongst neighbouring farmers
and declined with distance from the project farmer.
In addition to the impact survey various project
milestone data has been obtained for R8104 and R8435. These are listed
below:
Community structures and communication pathways
- 1 seed producer association
[KASPPA]
- 4 Farmer Ware Marketing
Groups
- 8 Parish Development
Councils
Primary Seed Multipliers
- Number of Primary Seed
Multipliers trained in seed production = 28
- Number of diffuse light
seed stores built with Primary Seed Multipliers = minimum of 24
- Bags of seed distributed
[End R8104] = 1340 @ 80kg per bag
Small scale farmers
- Number of smallscale farmer
receiving training in ware production and seed = approx 1700
- Simple ware storage units
facilities [not known]
Environmental Impact
Direct and Indirect Environmental Benefits:
The outputs of this project cluster have a common
goal of increasing potato productivity and controlling bacterial wilt.
When realised these outputs will result in the more effective use of land;
notably through reduced contamination of soil with Bacterial Wilt. The
impact of this outcome on the environment will be most apparent at the
hill/forest interface, a region that is often characterises by potato
cultivation. In Kenya, Uganda and many other nations the encroachment
of agriculture into primary forest is a significant environmental concern,
and the need to open up new land is often related to the falling productivity
of existing land due to soil borne pests.
Adverse Environmental Impacts:
No negative environmental impacts are
envisaged. The BCA if it were to realise commercial use would have
satisfied the fullest biosafety assessments.
However, this project cluster has already realised
a change in cropping practice, with potato displacing banana in order of
cultivation by area. Further, any outcome on recommended crop rotation
with potato to control Bacterial Wilt might lead to a changed cropping
pattern. The environmental impacts of these landscape level changes are
not known.
Coping with the Effects of Climate Change, or Risk from Natural Disasters:
The impacts of climate change are likely to result
in an increased severity of Bacterial Wilt within potato production, thus the
outputs of this project should mitigate this risk.
It is recognised that resilience to human diseases,
most notably HIV and aids, is strongly related to nutrition and health.
The impact survey on R8104 reported smallholders having a more varied diet
and enjoying greater food security as a result of the outputs from this
project cluster, which should in turn result in improved nutrition and health
and therefore improved resilience to disease.
Relevant Research Projects,
with links to the
Research for Development (R4D) web site and Technical Reports:
| R4D |
Project Title |
Technical Report |
| R6344 |
Developing effective and efficient marketing and credit systems in semi-arid production systems |
|
| R6507 |
The extension of storage life and improvement of quality in fresh sweet potato through selection of appropriate cultivars and handling conditions. |
 |
| R6580 |
Non-Chemical management of banana nematodes in East Africa |
 |
| R6733 |
An investigation into the biology, epidemiology and management of finger millet blast in low-input farming systems in E. Africa. |
 |
| R6769 |
Investigating the potential of cultivar differences in susceptibility to sweet potato weevil as a means of control |
58 MB |
| R6811 |
Groundnut Rosette Disease Epidemiology |
 |
| R7013 |
The role of warehousing in improving performance of agricultural markets, Phase II. |
 |
| R7151 |
Overcoming information constraints: improving horticultural marketing and technical information flows to smallholders |
 |
| R7405 |
Development of weed management in maize-based cropping systems |
 |
| R7445 |
Groundnut rosette disease management. Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R7494 |
Optimisation of horticulture research and uptake in India through the development of technical and management systems with public and private sector partners |
 |
| R7496 |
Marketing constraints to increasing financial returns to small and medium scale rice paddy producers in Bangladesh |
 |
| R7498 |
Maximising incomes from sweet potato production as a contribution to rural livelihoods |
 |
- Reaching the full potential of sweet potatoes in East Africa
|
 |
| R7503 |
Integrating pest management and soil fertility management |
 |
| R7520 |
Sweet potato cultivars with improved keeping qualities for East Africa |
 |
- Sweetpotato Postharvest Assessment. Experiences from East Africa.
|
|
|
| R7529 |
Epidemiology, vector studies and control of banana streak virus in East Africa highland bananas |
 |
| R7563 |
Management of cassava brown streak disease and mosaic disease in eastern and southern Africa |
 |
| R7564 |
Integrated management of Striga species on cereal crops in Tanzania.
Main Report. Annex 1 (workshop proceedings). |
 |
- Striga research activities in Dodoma region: evaluation of on-farm research trials 1999/ 2000 season
|
|
- Striga research activities in central zone and lake zone of Tanzania: evaluation of on-farm research trials 2000/ 2001 season
|
|
- Integrated management of Striga species on cereal crops in Tanzania: preliminary study of farmer perceptions of soil resources in central, lake and eastern zones
|
|
- Striga research activities in central, eastern, lake and southern highland zones of Tanzania: on station and on-farm trials for 2001/2002
|
|
- Striga research activities in central, eastern, lake and southern highlands zones of Tanzania on station and on-farm trials for 2000/2001 season.
|
|
- Growth and photosynthetic response of Sorghum bicolor cultivars pato, p9405, p9406 and macia to nitrogen availability and infection by the hemiparasitic weed Striga hermonthica.
|
|
- Chemical characteristics of soil and sorghum from Striga infested regions of Tanzania, and the influence of fertiliser application.
|
|
- Striga management in Uganda. Report on a visit to Serere for CPP project R7564.
|
|
|
|
| R7566 |
Management strategies for maize grey leaf spot (Cercospora zeae-maydis) in Kenya and Zimbabwe. Main Report. Appendix 6. |
 |
| R7567 |
Integrated management of banana diseases in Uganda.
Main Report. Photographic Plates. |
 |
| R7568 |
Characterisation and epidemiology of root rot diseases caused by Fusarium and Pythium spp. in beans in Uganda. Main Report. Annex |
 |
| R7569 |
Participatory promotion of disease resistant and farmer acceptable Phaseolus beans in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R7571 |
Management of virus diseases of important vegetable crops in Kenya.
Main Report. Annex 1, Annex 2, Annex 3, Annex 4. |
 |
| R7668 |
Impact and amelioration of sediment and agro-chemical pollution on Caribbean coastal waters |
 |
| R7778 |
Rice sheath blight complex caused by Rhizoctonia species: pathogen epidemiology and management strategies |
 |
| R7858 |
Promoting potato seed-tuber management for increased ware yields in Kenya, Uganda and the Republic of South Africa |
 |
| R7962 |
Linking soil fertility and improved cropping strategies to development interventions |
 |
| R7965 |
Promotion of integrated pest management strategies of major insect pests of Phaseolus beans in hillsides systems in eastern and southern Africa |
 |
| R7972 |
Integrated management of the banana weevil in Uganda |
 |
| R8014 |
Comparative assessment of the operational characteristics of rural water transport |
 |
- Waterways and Livelihoods: Journey to the Mainstream?
|
 |
- Water transport and development in a rural context:
the case of the Grand-Lahou region in Ivory Coast
|
 |
- Waterways and Livelihoods: Improving rural access and mobility through the development of rural water transport
|
 |
- Rural Water Transport: Literature Review
|
 |
|
|
| R8016 |
Enhanced accessibility for people with disabilities living in urban areas |
|
| |
- Enhancing the mobility of disabled people: Guidelines for practitioners
|
 |
- Practical solutions for transport access of urban residents with
disabilities
|
 |
|
|
| R8030 |
Finger millet blast in East Africa: Pathogen diversity and disease management strategies |
 |
| R8040 |
Rapid multiplication and distribution of sweet potato varieties with high yielding and B-carotene content |
 |
| R8044 |
Integrated management of major insect pests of potatoes in hillside systems in the Cochabamba region of Bolivia.
Main Report. Appendix 1 to 7. Appendix 8 to 14. |
 |
| R8104 |
Promoting potato seed-tuber management for increased ware yields in Kapchorwa District, Easten Uganda. Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R8105 |
Farmer-led multiplication of rosette resistant groundnut varieties for Eastern Uganda. Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R8113 |
Improved agricultural rural transport for Kenya |
 |
| R8114 |
Improved food crops marketing though appropriate transport for poor farmers in Uganda |
 |
| R8182 |
Strengthening technical innovation systems in potato-based agriculture in Bolivia: Bolivia Initiative |
 |
| R8194 |
On-farm verification and promotion of green manure for enhancing upland rice productivity on Striga-infested fields in Tanzania. Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R8212 |
Integrated pest and soil management to combat Striga, stemborers and declining soil fertility in the Lake Victoria basin |
 |
| R8215 |
Increasing food security and improving livelihoods through the promotion of integrated pest and soil management in lowland maize systems |
 |
| R8219 |
Improved access to appropriate farm inputs for integrated maize crop management by small-scale farmers in Embu and Kirinyaga Districts, Kenya |
 |
| R8243 |
Working with farmers to control sweet potato virus disease in East Africa |
 |
| R8250 |
Decentralised market information service in Lira District, Uganda |
 |
| R8273 |
Improving the livelihoods of small-scale sweet potato farmers in Central Uganda through a crop post harvest-based innovation system |
 |
| R8274 |
Improvement of maize marketing through adoption of improved post-harvest technologies and farmer group storage: a case study of Kiboga and Apac districts |
 |
| R8275 |
Farmer Organisations for market access |
 |
| R8281 |
Linking the demand for, and supply of, agricultural production and post-harvest information in Uganda. Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R8296 |
Promotion of sustainable approaches for the management of root-knot nematodes on vegetables in Kenya.
Main Report.
Annex 1, Annex 2, Annex 4, Annex 5, Annex 6, Annex 7a, Annex 7c |
 |
| R8312 |
Promotion of quality vegetable seed in Kenya |
 |
| R8316 |
Bean root rot disease management in Uganda |
 |
| R8341 |
Promoting adoption of integrated pest management in vegetable production |
 |

|
Leaflet:
Pest Promotion through the Cartoon Network. |
 |
| R8342 |
Promotion of improved IPM practices for banana diseases and pests in Uganda |
 |
| R8414 |
Promotion of bean pest IPM. |
 |
| R8415 |
Dissemination of improved Phaseolus bean varieties in Tanzania.
Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R8416 |
Up-scaling sustainable clean seed yam production systems for small-scale growers in Nigeria |
 |
| R8417 |
Promoting adoption of integrated pest management in vegetable production through improved resources for Farmer Trainers |
 |
| R8418 |
Promotion and development of the participatory market chain approach (PMCA) in Uganda |
 |
| R8421 |
Making informed choices: facilitating farmers' enterprise selection process in Uganda |
|
| R8422 |
Improving farmer and other stakeholders' access to quality information and products for pre- and post- harvest maize systems management in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. |
 |
| R8429 |
Linking supply and demand in Uganda phase 2. Main Report. Annex. |
 |
| R8435 |
Sustainable Potato Seed – Tuber Management and Marketing Through Commercialization (SPOMMAC).
Main Report. Annex 3, Annex 4, Annex 5, Annex 7 to 11, Annex 12. |
 |
| R8436 |
Green manure on striga infested fields in Tanzania.
Main Report. Annex 1, Annex 2, Annex 3, Annex 4, Annex 5, Annex 6 |
 |
| R8439 |
Promotion of quality kale seed in Kenya |
 |
| R8442 |
Commercial incentives for sustainable groundnut multiplication |
|
| R8443 |
IPM of potato pests in Bolivia |
 |
| R8445 |
Promotion of improved finger millet |
 |
| R8447 |
Rice pest information management |
 |
| R8449 |
Promotion and dissemination of integrated pest and soil fertility management strategies to combat striga, stemborers and declining soil fertility in the Lake Victoria basin |
 |
| R8452 |
Increasing food security and improving livelihoods through the promotion of integrated pest and soil management in lowland maize systems, Phase II |
 |
| R8453 |
Promotion of an IPM strategy for maize grey leaf spot (GLS) in East Africa |
 |
| R8478 |
Bean root rot disease management in Uganda (see also R8316) |
 |
| R8480 |
The Good Seed Initiative - sharing the learning from CPP programmes into pro-poor seed systems in East Africa |
 |
| R8485 |
INNOVA: Strengthening technical innovation systems in potato based agriculture in Bolivia |
 |
| R8498 |
Analysis of promotion and uptake pathways for CPH research |
 |
| R8513 |
Promotion of current knowledge on pests of coffee in East Africa |
 |
|
For relevant research projects, with links to further information 
Geographical regions included:
Burundi, Ethiopia, Jamaica,
Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, UK, Uganda,
Target Audiences for this content:
Crop farmers,
|