Chickpea, an orphan crop with potential for dry areas |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Participatory varietal selection in chickpea: improved varieties for rainfed agriculture in western India | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Western India is prone to droughts. Chickpeas recommended for this area were developed for irrigated land so farmers tend not to grow them. They stuck with old varieties or just let their land lie fallow. But farmers have helped choose drought-tolerant chickpeas that mature early. These are now grown on land that otherwise would not be cultivated after the rainy season crop of rice. Farmers only had small amounts of seed of the new varieties to test. They save seed of varieties they like because, although farmer demand for the new varieties is strong, their preferences have very little influence on national seed production. So although there is a huge potential for improved chickpea it is still an 'orphan' crop. Project Ref: PSP07:
Research Programmes: Plant Sciences Research Programme. DFID India Relevant Research Projects: Programme Development
Research Outputs, Problems and Solutions: Chickpea varieties ICCV 2, Pratap Chana 1 (ICCV 88202) and JG 412 in rainfed areas in western India (Table 1). These varieties were tested in participatory varietal selection (PVS) programmes where a broader choice of varieties of chickpea was offered. They were found to be preferred by farmers in Gujarat, Rajasthan and MP (Table 1). The new varieties give substantial increases in yield on farmers’ fields (Table 2). ICCV 2 is a Kabuli varieties that gives a higher value harvest. Table 1. The characteristics of the chickpea varieties identified in PVS studies in western India
In western India, resource poor, farmers of the indigenous people cultivate small areas of land. Those that grow chickpea only cultivate landraces (or Dahod Yellow a landrace-derived variety) that are low yielding and late maturing and hence not really suitable for the drought-prone conditions of resource-poor farmers’ fields. All the recommended varieties, other than Dahod Yellow, are rarely grown as they have been tested under irrigated conditions. They take too long to mature and hence are highly prone to end-of-season drought. By introducing PVS techniques we were able to test varieties under the target conditions and identify earlier duration varieties. Such varieties are suitable for growing in land that was previously left fallow after the rainy season harvest.
The main commodity is chickpea particularly under non-irrigated, post-rainy season conditions after maize and rice. The varieties were identified by PVS, a process that can be applied to all crops (see PSP33 on PVS).
There are many outputs that this could be clustered with including:
How the outputs were validated: In PVS validation is always by the first of the end users of a new variety – farmers - in on-farm participatory trials with participatory evaluation (using many techniques e.g., matrix ranking and surveys of perceptions) of many traits important to farmers. The trials were always replicated to provide a test of statistical significance. Validation of the yield increases were done by government organisations (State Agricultural Universities) in on-station trials. The final step of PVS - the wider dissemination of farmer-preferred varieties - tests the acceptability of a variety on a much larger scale. Some wider dissemination of the three varieties has been done and this has confirmed their acceptability. Validation was done by farmers working with researchers largely from the NGO, GVT, and the three State Agricultural Universities in western India that collaborated with GVT. State departments of Agriculture were involved to a limited extent. Further validation is being undertaken during the process of seed provision to farmers by:
The target groups of male and female farmers were from all social groups representing resource rich, medium and poor farmers. Evaluation of PVS trials included participating farmers (with a representative proportion of women) and their neighbours, relatives and friends (this always included some women). The evaluation of the post-harvest traits always involved women. The wealth classes were relative within the village but when compared to other areas in India the vast majority of the participating farmers would be classified as poor, Large increases in productivity were achieved over the local and modern check cultivars in station and on-farm trials (Table 2). The new varieties also excelled in a number of traits other than grain yield (Table 1). Table 2. Detail of testing of varieties and productivity increases
Where the Outputs were Validated: The outputs were validated in the semi-arid tropics with smallholder farmers under rainfed conditions (Table 2). The validation in western India was centred on adjoining areas of three western Indian states; eastern Gujarat, southern Rajasthan and western Madhya Pradesh in the districts of Jhabua (MP), Panchmahals (Gujarat) and Banswara (Rajasthan). These are hilly areas populated by very resource-poor farmers with land holdings that are small and fragmented. Chickpea is the main post rainy season (rabi) and is grown as a rainfed crop by these farmers in low-fertility fields. Chickpea productivity is very low, averaging below 1 t ha-1. Legumes form an important part of this predominantly maize-based farming system. Who are the Users? The outputs are being used by very resource poor farmers in the target areas described in more detail under "Where the outputs were validated". They have replaced their local landraces with the better varieties and have done so largely by seed saved from the previous harvest (farm-saved seed). Many of the adopters have obtained seed of the new varieties from their neighbours, relatives and friends. The grain is used by farmers for local consumption as dhal. Green pods of the crop are picked up and seed is used for vegetable purposes. Tender leaves are also used as vegetable. In all cases, the stover from the crop is used as a fodder source for animals. Farmers were given only 5 to 10 kg seed of any new variety to test and adopt. Some farmers saved the seed of varieties they preferred and continue to grow them from this seed. There has been a slow seed exchange among farmers that is limited by the lack of surplus seed and a lack of resources (mainly financial) to store the seed throughout the rainy season for planting in the next post-rainy season. Moreover, farm-saved seed becomes scarce following drought years. Where the outputs have been used: ICCV 2 is grown in Gujarat and Rajasthan (also suitable for MP). Pratap Chana 1 (ICCV 88202) is cultivated in Rajasthan (but also suitable for Gujarat and MP). JG 412 is the most preferred variety for MP. In western India all the chickpea varieties are grown in the semi-arid system in the post-rainy (rabi) season. These are all short-duration varieties that are more adapted to sloping land and shallow soils. In deeper, black cotton soils in level fields longer-duration varieties will be a higher yielding option though some farmers may grow ICCV 2 for its higher value grain. Both ICCV 2 and ICCV 88202 may be used to raise two crops (a green crop followed by a grain crop) or a single crop of chickpea with a following crop but this is only possible with better off farmers who have access to irrigation. Scale of Current Use: There has been limited dissemination of chickpea varieties because of constraints of seed availability. The total coverage of three varieties of chickpea is small as over all years of validation seed sufficient for about 1,000 ha has been distributed. From 1993 to 2006 about 33 t seed of ICCV 2 was disseminated for sowing over about 550 ha (Table 3). For Pratap Chana 1 about 26 t, sufficient for about 430 ha, was distributed. The smallest amount has been for JG 412 for which only 0.25 t seed has been distributed, sufficient for 5 ha (Table 4). For each of the three varieties, about 2 t breeder seed from planned production in 2006/07 in MP will be available (sufficient to sow 33 ha of each variety ) to produce foundation seed in 2007/08. In validation trials the majority of farmers saved seed of new varieties for sowing in the next year, and also exchanged with other farmers. But this spread is estimated to be very low as resource poor farmers have a limited capacity to store expensive chickpea seed throughout the rainy season. Table 3. Quantity of seed of chickpea varieties distributed by GVT
†ICCV 88202 Policy and Institutional Structures, and Key Components for Success: The main activities for dissemination of seed has been through projects such as the western India rainfed farming (WIRFP) which has now completed. Ongoing projects are listed under "How the outputs were validated" that have worked in the area of supplying seed of improved varieties of chickpea in western India. There is a system of seed supply of these released varieties that depends on multiplication by the State Seed Corporations and the National Seeds Corporation. This system has produced some seed of ICCV 2. However, seed is only produced on demand and few organisations are in a position to place orders for expensive seed. The farmers themselves have little or no influence over official demand so the needs of farmers does not get translated into demand for seed production. Capacity strengthening has to relate to the issues of creating demand. There is a need for raising awareness about these new varieties (and the PVS technology) through these existing networks. Hence there is a need for:
An involvement of private-sector seed companies would enhance the take up of new varieties. One option is private-sector (community based) seed production for which capacity building is required. Training is required in the economics and production of truthful seed. Lessons Learned and Uptake Pathways Promotion of Outputs: The GVT in western India is promoting the new varieties in 7 districts of MP, Gujarat and Rajasthan in conjunction with four agricultural universities in the three states. The SAUs, KVKs and other NGOs in the three states are promoting the varieties in more districts than this. The scale of this promotion is related to scale of current use (see "Scale of current use"). The present scale of promotion of chickpea is well below the potential demand and potential adoption of the new varieties. Potential Barriers Preventing Adoption of Outputs: Chickpea is an ‘orphan’ crop and (1) seed can only be produced in the rabi season for the following rabi season so expensive seed, that is vulnerable to storage pests, has to be stored throughout the rainy season (2) it has a low seed multiplication rates (3) and the high value and high volume (bulk) of chickpea seed increases the investment and costs of seed storage. There has been a lack of continuity in rural development initiatives. The DFID funded WIRFP has stopped. An increased role for the private sector is constrained by the economics of chickpea seed production (see the three points above) that make investments in more favourable agricultural areas more attractive. The inefficient promotion of varieties because the areas are remote and the demand for seed unpredictable because it varies with the rains. Also, the purchasing capacity of the farmers is low. Farmers also have limited resources to visit the their local farm science centre (KVK). Front line demonstrations by Departments of Agriculture are few and in more favourable agricultural environments. Seed production by GOs is dependent on actual orders for seed (called indents) and the poor farmers cannot raise indents. GOs responsible for producing seed, such as the SAUs, will not do so without an indent and the Department of Agriculture, and the extension system do not place indents until they are aware of the new variety and know there is a demand for seed. How to Overcome Barriers to Adoption of Outputs: A commercial approach to the production of chickpea seed needs to be established.. Given the biological problems outlined above, and the fluctuating demand for chickpea seed, feasibility studies on the profitability of chickpea seed production need to be done at a local and a macro level. We know that.cooperative societies such as Dahod Khareed Vechan Sangh (Dadod sale purchase cooperative) sell large quantities of Dahod Yellow so there is commercial activity in western India in chickpea seed. However, this is for more favourable areas that have irrigation. A demand and a supply of seed of these chickpea varieties in more favourable, irrigated areas adjacent to the target rainfed environments would help smooth out fluctuations in demand. This requires the validation of these varieties in such areas; there is some evidence that ICCV 2 would be grown for its higher value grain and Pratap Chana 1 for its extra earliness. Awareness needs to be raised in SAUs, NGOs, Departments of Agriculture and the private sector of the new chickpea varieties and awareness on the constraints to delivering them. Creating demand from State Departments of Agriculture for seed for minikits and demonstrations is a way of starting the process of raising indents for recently released varieties. There is one major remaining platform in western India, the MPRLP. Like all rural development programmes it is multifaceted and hence focus on important single issues such as the provision of new seed can be blurred. There is a need to raise awareness in this major platform of the possibilities presented by these new technologies. Lessons Learned: Using Rogers (2003) diffusion of information as a framework for the lessons learnt:
Hence provision of a sustainable seed supply is the most important factor in getting this research into use. In relation to this, key factors were identified that includes awareness raising amongst all of the stakeholders in the innovation system, and the role of the non-formal private sector in sustainable seed supply (see above). There is a need to better understand the profitability of chickpea seed production as a commercial venture. Poverty Impact Studies: These include impact at the level of individual farmers was studied very early in the GVT project (Joshi and Witcombe, 1996). There are high increases in total productivity with related advantages to the livelihoods of the resource poor farmers that are adopting them. With the completion of DFID funded Western India Rainfed Farming Project there was little time to study the impact of new chickpea varieties as they were introduced in the last years of the project. The impact can be extrapolated from a financial analysis given below. Financial analysis: For financial analysis we use very conservative assumptions of 10% area coverage with the new varieties and a marginal increase of 10% in yield from the new varieties. The additional benefit from three states will be £6.2 million per year (Table 6). The highest benefit of £4.7 m will be realisable in MP because of larger area with higher productivity among the three western Indian states. The actual benefit will increase in all three states if the cultivation of early maturing varieties such as ICCV 2 is extended to rice fallows in the rabi season. Table 6. Financial analysis for chickpea in western India
†Assuming 10% increased yield on 10% area of adoption of new varieties ††At Rs 15,000 t-1 (£181 t-1; 1£ =Rs 83) How the Poor have Benefited (including gender and other poverty groups): Chickpea validation trials with resource-poor farmers showed that they benefited by adopting the new PVS varieties. It is grown as cash crop and for home consumption. There was an improvement of nutrition status of the adopting farmers beside increasing their income. High grain yield gains from the new varieties showed that the participating farmers benefited from the new varieties. Substantial increases in yield and fodder can greatly improve the livelihoods of poor people. The provision of a rabi crop reduces out migration to large towns for daily paid labour and particularly benefits women. New varieties provided new opportunities of increasing family income. For instance ICCV 2 could be raised two times in the dry season; once for green pods and second for grain. Farmers traded off the lower yield potential of ICCV 2 with its earlier maturity that provided dual usage (green pods or grain). The increased yields increased food security and purchasing power of the participating farmers who had improved their living standards by using the additional income from increased yields. Direct and Indirect Environmental Benefits: Direct and indirect benefits:
Adverse Environmental Impacts:
Coping with the Effects of Climate Change, or Risk from Natural Disasters:
References Joshi, A. & Witcombe, J.R. (1998). Farmer participatory approaches for varietal improvement. pp. 171-190. in Seeds of Choice. Making the most of new varieties for small farmers. J.R. Witcombe, D.S. Virk and J. Farrington (Eds). Published by Oxford IBH, New Delhi and Intermediate Technology Publications, London: Joshi, A. & Witcombe, J.R. 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Farmer participatory varietal selection in India. Experimental Agriculture 32:461-477. Relevant Research Projects,
with links to the
|
For relevant research projects, with links to further information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||